القائمة
Evidence-first automation inventory and overlap audit workflow for HCP. Use when the user wants to know which jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, or wrappers are live, broken, redundant, or missing before fixing anything.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
顽皮制造 — Fuse multiple external skill repos/sources into an existing skill to create a unified, more capable version. Use when the user says 'merge these skills', 'combine X into Y', 'absorb the best parts of A/B/C into Z', 'upgrade this skill with features from those repos', or provides multiple GitHub URLs and asks to integrate them into a single skill. Also triggers on 'audit these skills and see if they can enhance ours'.
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
Guides systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Use when you need a systematic approach to finding and fixing the root cause rather than guessing.
Structures git workflow practices. Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, or when you need to organize work across multiple parallel streams.
Breaks work into ordered tasks. Use when you have a spec or clear requirements and need to break work into implementable tasks. Use when a task feels too large to start, when you need to estimate scope, or when parallel work is possible.
Drives development with tests. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality.
| name | automation-audit-ops |
| description | Evidence-first automation inventory and overlap audit workflow for HCP. Use when the user wants to know which jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, or wrappers are live, broken, redundant, or missing before fixing anything. |
| metadata | {"origin":"HCP"} |
Use this when the user asks what automations are live, which jobs are broken, where overlap exists, or what tooling and connectors are actually doing useful work right now.
This is an audit-first operator skill. The job is to produce an evidence-backed inventory and a keep / merge / cut / fix-next recommendation set before rewriting anything.
Pull these HCP-native skills into the workflow when relevant:
workspace-surface-audit for connector, MCP, hook, and app inventoryknowledge-ops when the audit needs to reconcile live repo truth with durable contextgithub-ops when the answer depends on CI, scheduled workflows, issues, or PR automationHCP-tools-cost-audit when the real problem is webhook fanout, queued jobs, or billing burn in the sibling app reporesearch-ops when local inventory must be compared against current platform support or public docsverification-loop for proving post-fix state instead of relying on assumed recoveryRead the current live surface before theorizing:
Group them by surface:
For every surfaced automation, mark:
Then classify the problem type:
Back every important claim with a concrete source:
If the current state is ambiguous, say so directly instead of pretending the audit is complete.
For each overlapping or suspect surface, return one call:
The value is in collapsing noisy automation into one canonical HCP lane, not in preserving every historical path.
CURRENT SURFACE
- automation
- source
- live state
- proof
FINDINGS
- active breakage
- overlap
- stale status
- missing capability
RECOMMENDATION
- keep
- merge
- cut
- fix next
NEXT HCP MOVE
- exact skill / hook / workflow / app lane to strengthen