القائمة
Use this skill to measure performance baselines, detect regressions before/after PRs, and compare stack alternatives.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
顽皮制造 — Fuse multiple external skill repos/sources into an existing skill to create a unified, more capable version. Use when the user says 'merge these skills', 'combine X into Y', 'absorb the best parts of A/B/C into Z', 'upgrade this skill with features from those repos', or provides multiple GitHub URLs and asks to integrate them into a single skill. Also triggers on 'audit these skills and see if they can enhance ours'.
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
Guides systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Use when you need a systematic approach to finding and fixing the root cause rather than guessing.
Structures git workflow practices. Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, or when you need to organize work across multiple parallel streams.
Breaks work into ordered tasks. Use when you have a spec or clear requirements and need to break work into implementable tasks. Use when a task feels too large to start, when you need to estimate scope, or when parallel work is possible.
Drives development with tests. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality.
| name | benchmark |
| description | Use this skill to measure performance baselines, detect regressions before/after PRs, and compare stack alternatives. |
| metadata | {"origin":"HCP"} |
Measures real browser metrics via browser MCP:
1. Navigate to each target URL
2. Measure Core Web Vitals:
- LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) — target < 2.5s
- CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) — target < 0.1
- INP (Interaction to Next Paint) — target < 200ms
- FCP (First Contentful Paint) — target < 1.8s
- TTFB (Time to First Byte) — target < 800ms
3. Measure resource sizes:
- Total page weight (target < 1MB)
- JS bundle size (target < 200KB gzipped)
- CSS size
- Image weight
- Third-party script weight
4. Count network requests
5. Check for render-blocking resources
Benchmarks API endpoints:
1. Hit each endpoint 100 times
2. Measure: p50, p95, p99 latency
3. Track: response size, status codes
4. Test under load: 10 concurrent requests
5. Compare against SLA targets
Measures development feedback loop:
1. Cold build time
2. Hot reload time (HMR)
3. Test suite duration
4. TypeScript check time
5. Lint time
6. Docker build time
Run before and after a change to measure impact:
/benchmark baseline # saves current metrics
# ... make changes ...
/benchmark compare # compares against baseline
Output:
| Metric | Before | After | Delta | Verdict |
|--------|--------|-------|-------|---------|
| LCP | 1.2s | 1.4s | +200ms | WARNING: WARN |
| Bundle | 180KB | 175KB | -5KB | ✓ BETTER |
| Build | 12s | 14s | +2s | WARNING: WARN |
Stores baselines in .HCP/benchmarks/ as JSON. Git-tracked so the team shares baselines.
/benchmark compare on every PR/canary-watch for post-deploy monitoring/browser-qa for full pre-ship checklist