name	generate-texture
description	Generate a tileable texture asset for Deep Yellow using the virtuous cycle workflow. Use when Drew asks to "generate a texture", "create a texture", "make a texture", mentions needing a new texture for walls/floors/ceilings/ entities/items, or says anything about procedural texture generation. Handles the full creator→critic→revision cycle with sub-agents.

Generate Texture — Virtuous Cycle Workflow

Procedural texture generation using the iterative creator/critic sub-agent cycle. You are the conductor — you never create or critique textures yourself.

Your Role

YOU ARE: Orchestra conductor
YOU ARE NOT: Musician

You NEVER: write generate.py, run scripts, read output.png, critique textures
You ONLY: spawn agents → wait → synthesize feedback → repeat

Prerequisites

Python venv: /home/drew/projects/deep_yellow/venv/
Output convention: _claude_scripts/textures/<texture_name>/generate.py → output.png
All textures must be tileable/seamless unless explicitly stated otherwise

Quick Start

Ask Drew:

What texture? (e.g., "yellow wallpaper", "concrete floor", "rusty metal door")
Dimensions? (default: 128×128)
Any reference? (Backrooms wiki page, photo, description)

Then enter the cycle.

The Cycle

State Machine

Track your state explicitly. You may ONLY perform the allowed actions for your current state.

CURRENT STATE: [ SPAWNING_CREATOR | AWAITING_CREATOR | PREPARING_CRITICS | AWAITING_CRITICS | SYNTHESIZING | DONE ]

State	Allowed Actions	Forbidden
SPAWNING_CREATOR	Spawn ONE creator agent via Task tool	Writing code, spawning critics
AWAITING_CREATOR	Wait for creator agent to return	Anything else
PREPARING_CRITICS	Copy output.png to /tmp with random hash name	Reading the image yourself
AWAITING_CRITICS	Spawn comparison + blind critic agents, wait	Analyzing images yourself
SYNTHESIZING	Read critic reports, draft revision notes	Spawning agents, editing code
DONE	Report to Drew, move file into place	Starting new iterations

Anti-Pattern Checklist (Before EVERY Action)

[ ] Am I about to write/edit generate.py myself? → STOP, spawn creator
[ ] Am I spawning agents in parallel during the cycle? → STOP, go sequential
[ ] Am I giving blind critic ANY context? → STOP, check for info leakage
[ ] Am I reading/analyzing output.png myself? → STOP, that's the critics' job
[ ] Am I using anything other than the Task tool to spawn agents? → STOP

Step-by-Step

Step 1: Gather Requirements

Confirm with Drew:

Texture description (visual style, colors, patterns, weathering)
Dimensions (default 128×128)
Reference material (URLs, descriptions, existing textures to match)
Material destination (which .tres file, what surface type)

Step 2: Spawn Creator Agent

State: SPAWNING_CREATOR

Spawn a Task agent (subagent_type: "general-purpose") with this context:

You are a procedural texture creator. Your job:

1. Create a Python script at: _claude_scripts/textures/<NAME>/generate.py
2. The script MUST output: _claude_scripts/textures/<NAME>/output.png
3. Requirements: <FULL DESCRIPTION FROM DREW + ANY REVISION NOTES>

Technical requirements:
- Run in venv: /home/drew/projects/deep_yellow/venv/
- Install any needed packages (pip install)
- Texture MUST be tileable/seamless
- Use modulo wrapping for ALL pixel operations: img_array[y % SIZE, x % SIZE]
- Pattern dimensions must divide texture size evenly
- PIL ImageDraw clips at boundaries — use pixel-level drawing with modulo for wrapping
- You have full creative freedom: PIL, NumPy, noise libraries, Cairo, etc.

Steps:
1. Create the generate.py script
2. Install dependencies if needed: cd /home/drew/projects/deep_yellow && source venv/bin/activate && pip install <packages>
3. Run: cd /home/drew/projects/deep_yellow && source venv/bin/activate && cd _claude_scripts/textures/<NAME> && python generate.py
4. Verify output.png was created and check its dimensions

If this is a REVISION, here is what the critics said: <CRITIC FEEDBACK>
Modify the existing generate.py to address their feedback.

Then WAIT for the creator to finish.

Step 3: Prepare for Critics

State: PREPARING_CRITICS

Copy the output to a neutral location to prevent information leakage to the blind critic:

cp _claude_scripts/textures/<NAME>/output.png /tmp/texture_review_$(openssl rand -hex 4).png

Note the random filename for the blind critic.

Step 4: Spawn Critics

State: AWAITING_CRITICS

Spawn TWO Task agents (these CAN run in parallel — they're independent):

Comparison Critic (subagent_type: "general-purpose"):

You are a texture quality critic. Review the texture at:
  _claude_scripts/textures/<NAME>/output.png

It should match this description: <ORIGINAL REQUIREMENTS>

Evaluate:
1. Does it match the visual description? (colors, patterns, style)
2. Does it look tileable? (check edges — do left/right and top/bottom align?)
3. Any obvious artifacts, banding, or generation errors?
4. Overall quality assessment

Be specific about any issues. "Looks good" is not helpful — describe what you see.

Blind Critic (subagent_type: "general-purpose"):

You are a texture reviewer. Look at the image at:
  /tmp/<RANDOM_HASH_FILENAME>.png

Describe what you see. Be specific about:
1. What does this image depict?
2. Does it look like it would tile seamlessly? (check edges)
3. Any artifacts, oddities, or quality issues?
4. What is the overall impression?

Just describe what you observe — no other context is needed.

CRITICAL: The blind critic gets ONLY the /tmp path. No texture name, no description, no context.

Then WAIT for both critics to return.

Step 5: Synthesize Feedback

State: SYNTHESIZING

Read both critic reports. Decide:

Both approve → Move to Step 6 (DONE)
Issues found → Draft specific revision notes, return to Step 2

Revision notes should be actionable:

"Reduce saturation by 20%" not "looks too bright"
"Fix tiling — left edge doesn't match right edge, use modulo wrapping" not "tiling is off"
"Add subtle vertical lines every 32px" not "needs more detail"

Share the synthesis with Drew and confirm whether to iterate or accept.

Step 6: Finalize

State: DONE

Report to Drew:

Show the final texture path: _claude_scripts/textures/<NAME>/output.png
Summarize what the critics said
Note how many iterations it took
Ask if Drew wants to test it in-game or if any manual tweaks are needed

If Drew needs the texture imported into a Godot material (.tres), help with that as a separate step.

Iteration History

Optionally save iteration snapshots:

_claude_scripts/textures/<NAME>/
├── generate.py          # Final script
├── output.png           # Final texture
└── iterations/          # History (optional)
    ├── v1.png
    ├── v2.png
    └── v3.png

Key Lessons (from real usage)

Tiling is the hardest part — expect 2-4 iterations minimum for seamless tiling
PIL ImageDraw clips at boundaries — pixel-level drawing with modulo is more reliable
Pattern dimensions must divide texture size — 32px repeat on 128px = 4 clean repeats
"Serviceable" tiling is often good enough — tiny imperfections are fine for game textures
Drew's corrections save iterations — relay user feedback verbatim to the creator
Typical cycle: 3-7 iterations — don't rush, the cycle exists for a reason

Notes

The creator agent has full creative freedom with Python — any library, any technique
Always activate the venv before running: source /home/drew/projects/deep_yellow/venv/bin/activate
Blind critic information leakage is the #1 workflow failure — be paranoid about it
You can spawn comparison + blind critics in parallel (they're independent)
Everything else is strictly sequential

name	generate-texture
description	Generate a tileable texture asset for Deep Yellow using the virtuous cycle workflow. Use when Drew asks to "generate a texture", "create a texture", "make a texture", mentions needing a new texture for walls/floors/ceilings/ entities/items, or says anything about procedural texture generation. Handles the full creator→critic→revision cycle with sub-agents.