القائمة
Use when reviewing Wort-Werk design proposals, implementation plans, ADR changes, repository-level direction, or refactors that affect boundaries, layering, or long-term structure.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Use when reviewing Wort-Werk code, diffs, or implementation details for consistency across modules, naming, layering, testing patterns, and repository conventions.
Use when reviewing Wort-Werk authentication, sessions, CSRF, database access, containers, OCI deployment, secrets, or any change with confidentiality, integrity, or availability risk.
| name | architecture-review |
| description | Use when reviewing Wort-Werk design proposals, implementation plans, ADR changes, repository-level direction, or refactors that affect boundaries, layering, or long-term structure. |
Use this skill for design and planning review before implementation, or when judging whether a larger change fits the current repository direction.
Do not use this skill for a narrow code review of an isolated diff when the main question is consistency with surrounding code. Use project-coherence-review for that.
Before judging the change, read:
AGENTS.mddocs/spec/docs/tasks/docs/decisions/If those artifacts are missing or inconsistent, stop and call that out before commenting on implementation details.
Check whether the proposal or change:
Prefer consistency with the current repository unless there is a clear and defensible reason to change direction.
Be strict about:
Specs, tasks, and ADRs remain the source of truth. This skill is a review lens, not a replacement for repository documentation.