القائمة
Academic paper writing workflow — literature review, LaTeX setup, structure, citations, and conference submissions.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Compress conversation context — summarize the current session, extract key decisions and facts, then compact history to free up context window.
Generate insights about your Claude Code usage — what topics you work on most, common patterns, productivity trends.
Route Claude Code work by complexity, risk, and tool needs. Use when deciding how much reasoning depth a task needs, whether to read project memory first, whether the task should be decomposed, and whether the work is lightweight, standard, or investigation-heavy.
Query Polymarket prediction markets for probability data and research insights on real-world events.
Search and retrieve academic papers from arXiv using their free REST API. No API key needed.
Query Base (Ethereum L2) blockchain data — wallet balances, token info, transactions, gas analysis, contract inspection. No API key required.
| name | research-paper-writing |
| description | Academic paper writing workflow — literature review, LaTeX setup, structure, citations, and conference submissions. |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | hermes-CCC (ported from Hermes Agent by NousResearch) |
| license | MIT |
| metadata | {"hermes":{"tags":["Research","Academic","Writing","LaTeX","Papers","Citations","Conference"],"related_skills":["arxiv"]}} |
End-to-end workflow for writing and submitting academic papers.
1. Title & Authors
2. Abstract ← write last, 150-250 words
3. Introduction ← problem, gap, contributions, roadmap
4. Related Work ← what exists, why insufficient
5. Methodology ← your approach, architecture, algorithm
6. Experiments ← setup, baselines, metrics
7. Results ← tables, figures, analysis
8. Discussion ← limitations, broader impact
9. Conclusion ← summary, future work
10. References
Appendix (optional)
[PROBLEM] Prior work has struggled with X.
[GAP] Existing approaches fail because Y.
[SOLUTION] We propose Z, which does A and B.
[RESULTS] On benchmark C, we achieve D% improvement.
[IMPACT] This enables E.
# Ubuntu/Debian
sudo apt install texlive-full
# macOS
brew install --cask mactex
# Windows
# Install MiKTeX from miktex.org
# Verify
pdflatex --version
bibtex --version
pdflatex paper.tex
bibtex paper
pdflatex paper.tex
pdflatex paper.tex # run 3x for refs to resolve
# Or with latexmk (auto-detects what to run)
latexmk -pdf paper.tex
latexmk -pdf -pvc paper.tex # continuous preview
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath, amssymb, graphicx, booktabs, hyperref}
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
\usepackage[numbers]{natbib}
\title{Your Paper Title}
\author{Author One \and Author Two}
\date{}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\begin{abstract}
Your abstract here.
\end{abstract}
\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:intro}
\section{Related Work}
Prior work \citep{vaswani2017attention} showed...
\section{Method}
\label{sec:method}
\section{Experiments}
\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\caption{Main results}
\begin{tabular}{lcc}
\toprule
Method & Metric A & Metric B \\
\midrule
Baseline & 70.1 & 65.3 \\
Ours & \textbf{74.8} & \textbf{70.2} \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\section{Conclusion}
\bibliography{references}
\bibliographystyle{plainnat}
\end{document}
@article{vaswani2017attention,
title={Attention is all you need},
author={Vaswani, Ashish and others},
journal={NeurIPS},
year={2017}
}
@inproceedings{devlin2019bert,
title={{BERT}: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers},
author={Devlin, Jacob and others},
booktitle={NAACL},
year={2019}
}
Get BibTeX from:
# Use /arxiv skill to find papers
# Example searches:
# /arxiv search "GRPO reinforcement learning language model"
# /arxiv search "retrieval augmented generation survey"
# /arxiv get 2401.00001
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(4, 3))
x = np.linspace(0, 10, 100)
ax.plot(x, np.sin(x), label="Our Method")
ax.plot(x, np.cos(x), "--", label="Baseline")
ax.set_xlabel("Epoch")
ax.set_ylabel("Accuracy")
ax.legend()
ax.grid(alpha=0.3)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig("figure1.pdf", bbox_inches="tight", dpi=300)
Include in LaTeX:
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{figure1.pdf}
\caption{Comparison of our method vs baseline.}
\label{fig:main}
\end{figure}
| Conference | Deadline | Template |
|---|---|---|
| NeurIPS | May | neurips.cc |
| ICLR | Oct | iclr.cc |
| ICML | Jan | icml.cc |
| ACL | Feb | acl-org.github.io |
| AAAI | Aug | aaai.org |
Download official template from the conference website — never use unofficial ones.
.tex, .bib, .pdf files to Overleaf