بنقرة واحدة
review-pr
Diff-aware PR security review with verified findings and PR comment payload.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Diff-aware PR security review with verified findings and PR comment payload.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Use this skill when the user is auditing a decompiled Android application — directory structure includes `jadx_out/` / `apktool_out/`, files end in `.smali` / are jadx-renamed to `defpackage/*.java`, or the conversation mentions an APK / xAPK / `com.example.*` package. Covers the high-signal vulnerability classes vuln-scout detects in decompiled APKs and the conventions for running the unified mobile-audit workflow.
Use this skill when the user is auditing an iOS application — directory contains `.ipa`, `Info.plist`, `*.swift`, `*.m`, `*.mm`, or an `xcodeproj`. Also activates when the conversation mentions WKWebView, NSURLSession, Keychain, App Transport Security, or any `com.apple.*` / `bundleidentifier`-style iOS package name.
Use this skill when reviewing mobile code that handles card data, payment tokenization, or third-party payment SDK integrations (Braintree, Stripe, Adyen, Google Pay, Apple Pay, FirstData-style iframe encryptors). The skill catalogues the high-signal attack patterns vuln-scout detects in mobile payment flows — server-controlled tokenization URLs, JavaScript-injection-into-WebView card-data exfiltration, JS-bridge token construction, and payment scope mismatches — and maps each to the detector that fires.
This skill should be used when the user asks about "business logic", "workflow vulnerability", "trust boundary", "state machine", "authorization bypass", "multi-step process", "workflow bypass", "application logic flaw", or needs to identify business logic vulnerabilities during whitebox security review.
This skill should be used when the user asks about "cache poisoning", "web cache deception", "CDN cache", "proxy cache", "nginx cache", "varnish", "cache key manipulation", "response caching", or needs to find cache-related vulnerabilities during whitebox security review.
This skill should be used when the user asks about "cloud security", "AWS security", "GCP security", "Azure security", "Kubernetes security", "IMDS", "instance metadata", "S3 bucket policy", "IAM", "serverless security", "Lambda security", "container security", "cloud misconfiguration", "SSRF to cloud metadata", or needs to identify cloud-native security issues during whitebox security review.
| name | review-pr |
| description | Diff-aware PR security review with verified findings and PR comment payload. |
Use this task skill when the user asks to review this PR, scan a PR, run a diff scan, or check a pull request for vulnerabilities.
origin/main when the user does not specify one./vuln-scout:diff <base> to produce changed-code findings.code-reviewer on new or changed findings only./vuln-scout:verify --from .claude/diff-findings.json for findings that affect the PR.false-positive-verifier for high-impact or ambiguous results.poc-safety-check before any dynamic validation or PoC work./vuln-scout:report --format md for the PR comment payload./vuln-scout:report --format bundle --output evidence-bundle for evidence handoff..claude/diff-findings.jsonpr-comment.mdevidence-bundle/Do not trigger for general git diff questions, style-only code review, STRIDE threat modeling, or framework-specific vulnerability education without a PR review request.