| name | using-superpowers-ecc |
| description | Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions |
If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill.
If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill.
IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.
This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
Instruction Priority
Superpowers-ecc skills override default system prompt behavior, but user instructions always take precedence:
- User's explicit instructions (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, direct requests) — highest priority
- Superpowers-ecc skills — override default system behavior where they conflict
- Default system prompt — lowest priority
If CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md says "don't use TDD" and a skill says "always use TDD," follow the user's instructions. The user is in control.
How to Access Skills
In Claude Code: Use the Skill tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you—follow it directly. Never use the Read tool on skill files.
In Cursor / OpenCode / Codex CLI: Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded. Cross-platform config files are in .cursor/, .opencode/, and .codex/ respectively.
Platform Adaptation
Skills use Claude Code tool names. Non-CC platforms: see references/codex-tools.md (Codex) for tool equivalents.
Using Skills
The Rule
Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action. Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.
digraph skill_flow {
"User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
"About to EnterPlanMode?" [shape=doublecircle];
"Already brainstormed?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke brainstorming skill" [shape=box];
"Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
"Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" [shape=box];
"Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
"Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
"About to EnterPlanMode?" -> "Already brainstormed?";
"Already brainstormed?" -> "Invoke brainstorming skill" [label="no"];
"Already brainstormed?" -> "Might any skill apply?" [label="yes"];
"Invoke brainstorming skill" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
"Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
"Has checklist?" -> "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [label="yes"];
"Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}
Red Flags
These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:
| Thought | Reality |
|---|
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I can check git/files quickly" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. |
| "Let me gather information first" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. |
| "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. |
| "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read current version. |
| "This doesn't count as a task" | Action = task. Check for skills. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
| "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. |
Skill Priority
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
- Process skills first (brainstorming, debugging) - these determine HOW to approach the task
- Implementation skills second (api-design, deployment-patterns) - these guide execution
"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills.
"Fix this bug" → debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
Skill Types
Rigid (TDD, debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
Flexible (patterns): Adapt principles to context.
The skill itself tells you which.
User Instructions
Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.
Two-Layer Agent Architecture
Superpowers-ecc uses two complementary layers for agent-based work:
Layer 1: Embedded Subagent Prompts
Skills like subagent-driven-development contain execution machinery — they define how to decompose work, dispatch subagents via the Task tool, and coordinate results. These are process skills that drive multi-agent workflows from within a conversation.
When to use: You're executing a multi-step implementation plan and need to parallelize work across subagents. The skill itself orchestrates the dispatch.
Key skills: subagent-driven-development, dispatching-parallel-agents, executing-plans
Layer 2: Standalone Agents
The agents/ directory contains domain-expert agents — specialized consultants you dispatch via commands. Each agent has a focused system prompt and a narrow domain of expertise.
| Agent | Domain |
|---|
planner | Breaks down tasks into phased implementation plans |
architect | System design, component boundaries, dependency analysis |
code-reviewer | Code quality, patterns, correctness |
security-reviewer | OWASP-based security analysis |
build-error-resolver | Diagnoses and fixes build/compile errors |
refactor-cleaner | Identifies and executes safe refactors |
e2e-runner | Runs and debugs end-to-end test suites |
When to use: You need a focused expert opinion or to delegate a well-scoped task (review this PR, analyze this architecture, fix this build error). Dispatch via the appropriate command.
Choosing Between Layers
| Situation | Use |
|---|
| Multi-step implementation with parallelism | Layer 1 (embedded subagent prompts) |
| Focused expert task (review, analysis, diagnosis) | Layer 2 (standalone agents) |
| Complex project requiring both coordination and expertise | Both — Layer 1 orchestrates, Layer 2 agents get dispatched as subagents |
State & Learning System
Superpowers-ecc persists state across conversations in ~/.claude/superpowers-ecc/.
Sessions
Sessions maintain context across multiple conversations on the same project or task. When a session is active, the agent has access to prior decisions, plans, and progress — avoiding the cold-start problem of each conversation starting from scratch.
Instincts
The instinct system accumulates learned patterns with confidence scores. As the agent encounters repeated situations, successful approaches get reinforced and unsuccessful ones get deprioritized. Instincts represent "muscle memory" — things the agent has learned work well in this codebase or for this user.
Each instinct has:
- A pattern describing the situation
- A response describing the learned behavior
- A confidence score (0.0–1.0) that increases with successful application
Commands
| Command | Purpose |
|---|
/learn | Capture a new learning from the current context |
/evolve | Review and update existing instincts based on new evidence |
/instinct-status | Show current instincts and their confidence scores |
ECC Additions
Beyond the 14 superpowers-origin skills, superpowers-ecc adds 10 skills that extend coverage into security, operations, continuous learning, and development rigor:
| Skill | What it adds |
|---|
security-review | OWASP-based security checklist for code and architecture review |
continuous-learning-v2 | Instinct system with confidence scoring — the learning engine behind /learn, /evolve, /instinct-status |
search-first | Enforces research-before-coding discipline — read docs, search issues, check prior art |
eval-harness | Eval-driven development with grader types (exact, llm, human) and pass@k metrics |
verification-loop | Continuous build/test/lint/typecheck verification — catches breakage as you code |
strategic-compact | Token-aware compaction suggestions — when to compact and what to preserve |
token-optimization | System prompt slimming, model selection guidance, context budget management |
api-design | REST patterns, pagination, error responses, versioning conventions |
deployment-patterns | CI/CD pipelines, Docker configuration, health checks, rollback strategies |
e2e-testing | Playwright end-to-end testing patterns, selectors, fixtures, debugging |
Skill Inventory
All 24 skills grouped by category:
Core Workflow (7)
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|
brainstorming | Structured ideation before implementation |
writing-plans | Phased implementation plans with clear deliverables |
executing-plans | Plan execution with progress tracking |
test-driven-development | Red-green-refactor TDD discipline |
systematic-debugging | Hypothesis-driven bug investigation |
subagent-driven-development | Multi-agent parallel execution |
dispatching-parallel-agents | Parallel subagent dispatch patterns |
Supporting (6)
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|
finishing-a-development-branch | Branch completion checklist |
requesting-code-review | How to request and structure code reviews |
receiving-code-review | How to process and act on review feedback |
verification-before-completion | Final verification before marking work done |
using-git-worktrees | Git worktree workflows for parallel development |
writing-skills | How to author new skills |
Onboarding (1)
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|
using-superpowers-ecc | This skill — how to find and use all other skills |
Security & Quality (2)
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|
security-review | OWASP-based security analysis |
verification-loop | Continuous build/test/lint/typecheck verification |
Development Rigor (3)
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|
search-first | Research before coding |
eval-harness | Eval-driven development with grader types and pass@k |
e2e-testing | Playwright end-to-end testing patterns |
Architecture & API (2)
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|
api-design | REST patterns, pagination, error responses |
deployment-patterns | CI/CD, Docker, health checks |
Learning & Optimization (3)
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|
continuous-learning-v2 | Instinct system with confidence scoring |
strategic-compact | Token-aware compaction suggestions |
token-optimization | System prompt slimming, model selection |