القائمة
Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, update or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
Use this skill when the user wants direct operations on an Obsidian vault: read or edit notes and daily notes, search vault contents, count or list notes, manage tasks, move or rename files, find orphaned notes or broken links, inspect frontmatter/properties, manage sync or file history, query Bases, manage bookmarks, script the CLI, or run JavaScript against the Obsidian API. Trigger when the request implies "go into my vault and do X"; the user wants action on vault data, not an explanation. Skip pure conceptual or GUI-help questions such as settings navigation, theme/plugin installation, sync troubleshooting, Dataview syntax, keyboard shortcuts, or parsing vault files with unrelated external scripts.
Captures corrections, failures, missing capabilities, and reusable discoveries in agent so future work improves. Use this skill whenever a command, tool, or API fails unexpectedly; the user corrects the agent; the agent realizes its knowledge is outdated or wrong; a missing capability is exposed; or a better recurring approach is discovered. Record the result under .agents/learnings/, review related entries before major tasks, and promote durable workflow rules into AGENTS.md when they should change future behavior.
Generate tests for a completed phase based on UAT criteria and implementation
Generate an AI-SPEC.md design contract for phases that involve building AI systems.
Autonomous audit-to-fix pipeline — find issues, classify, fix, test, commit
| name | gsd-code-review |
| description | Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems |
Spawns the gsd-code-reviewer agent to analyze code at the specified depth level. Produces REVIEW.md artifact in the phase directory with severity-classified findings.
Arguments:
--depth=quick|standard|deep (optional) — review depth level, overrides workflow.code_review_depth config
--files file1,file2,... (optional) — explicit comma-separated file list, skips SUMMARY/git scoping (highest precedence for scoping)--fix (optional) — after review completes (or if REVIEW.md already exists), auto-apply fixes found. Spawns gsd-code-fixer agent. Accepts sub-flags:
--all — include Info findings in fix scope (default: Critical + Warning only)--auto — enable fix + re-review iteration loop, capped at 3 iterationsOutput: {padded_phase}-REVIEW.md in phase directory + inline summary of findings
<execution_context> @/home/aming/.config/opencode/gsd-core/workflows/code-review.md </execution_context>
Phase: $ARGUMENTS (first positional argument is phase number)Optional flags parsed from $ARGUMENTS:
--depth=VALUE — Depth override (quick|standard|deep). If provided, overrides workflow.code_review_depth config.--files=file1,file2,... — Explicit file list override. Has highest precedence for file scoping per D-08. When provided, workflow skips SUMMARY.md extraction and git diff fallback entirely.Context files (AGENTS.md, SUMMARY.md, phase state) are resolved inside the workflow via gsd-tools query init.phase-op and delegated to agent via <files_to_read> blocks.
Execute end-to-end.
The workflow (not this command) enforces these gates: