ari-gap-analyzer
Identify gaps in ARI's capabilities, skills, and coverage
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Identify gaps in ARI's capabilities, skills, and coverage
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Discord slash commands, approval routing, channel policy, button interaction patterns for OpenClaw/ARI Discord integration
Obsidian vault integration patterns — vault-analyzer.ts, /ari-vault-* commands, morning briefing snippet, PARA structure, read-only enforcement
OpenClaw plugin development patterns — hooks, manifest structure, plugin SDK, APEX/CODEX enforcement
NOVA's P1 PayThePryce pipeline — market signal ingest, card detection, price monitoring, script generation, thumbnail generation, video assembly, approval gate
CHASE's P2 Pryceless Solutions pipeline — lead discovery, 5-criteria audit, LLM qualification, Prompt Forge 4-pass lock, demo generation, outreach approval gate
NOVA's thumbnail generation pipeline — Ideogram V3 via Fal.ai (primary) + DALL-E 3 fallback, 4-variant strategy, Pokemon TCG copyright rules,
| name | ari-gap-analyzer |
| description | Identify gaps in ARI's capabilities, skills, and coverage |
Systematically identify gaps in ARI's capabilities, skill coverage, test coverage, and operational readiness.
Analyze existing skills against ARI's architecture:
| Layer | Required Skills | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Kernel | Security, audit, config | Check |
| System | Routing, storage | Check |
| Agents | Coordination, tools | Check |
| Governance | Council, quality gates | Check |
| Ops | Deployment, monitoring | Check |
| CLI | Command patterns | Check |
Check test coverage across critical paths:
- Security tests: 100% required
- Kernel tests: 100% required
- Agent tests: 90%+ target
- Integration tests: 80%+ target
- Overall: 80%+ minimum
Verify documentation completeness:
- [ ] All public APIs documented
- [ ] Architecture decisions recorded
- [ ] Security model documented
- [ ] Deployment guide complete
- [ ] Troubleshooting guide exists
Assess production readiness:
- [ ] Monitoring configured
- [ ] Alerting set up
- [ ] Backup procedures defined
- [ ] Recovery tested
- [ ] Performance baselines established
List all current:
Cross-reference against:
Look for:
Rank gaps by:
For each gap:
## Gap Analysis Report
### Summary
- Total gaps identified: X
- Critical: X
- High: X
- Medium: X
- Low: X
### Critical Gaps
| Gap | Area | Impact | Remediation |
|-----|------|--------|-------------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
### Coverage Matrix
| Component | Skills | Tests | Docs | Status |
|-----------|--------|-------|------|--------|
| Kernel | Yes | 100% | Yes | OK |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
### Recommended Actions
1. [Highest priority action]
2. [Second priority action]
...