structured-output

Formats review deliverables with consistent structure for comparable findings. Use when finalizing any review or analysis that must be shared or compared.

الانتقال إلى التثبيت

المستودع: athola/claude-night-market
آخر نشاط في المصدر: ٥ يونيو ٢٠٢٦ في ٢١:٤٥
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة: الإنجليزية
النجوم: ٣٢٧
التفرعات: ٣٥

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

العودة إلى البحث العودة إلى التثبيت

Table of Contents

When to Use
Activation Patterns
Required TodoWrite Items
Step 1: Select Template (structured-output:template-selected)
Step 2: Format Findings (structured-output:findings-formatted)
Step 3: Assign Actions (structured-output:actions-assigned)
Step 4: Attach Appendix (structured-output:appendix-attached)
Output Quality Checklist
Exit Criteria

Structured Output

When To Use

When finalizing any review or analysis.
To format findings in a consistent way that names specific next steps.
Before presenting results to stakeholders or committing them to documentation.

When NOT To Use

Capturing evidence during analysis - use proof-of-work
Reviewing changes - use diff-analysis or review-core first

Activation Patterns

Trigger Keywords: format, structure, deliverable, report, organize, present, consistent Contextual Cues:

"format this as a report" or "structure the output"
"create a deliverable" or "present these findings"
"organize this consistently" or "standardize the format"
"make this actionable" or "prepare for stakeholders"

Auto-Load When: Finalizing any analysis deliverable or when consistent formatting is requested.

Required TodoWrite Items

structured-output:template-selected
structured-output:findings-formatted
structured-output:actions-assigned
structured-output:appendix-attached

Mark each item complete as you finish the corresponding step.

Step 1: Select Template (`structured-output:template-selected`)

Choose output format based on deliverable type:
- Review Report: Summary, Findings, Recommendations, Evidence.
- PR Description: Summary, Changes, Test Plan, Notes.
- Release Notes: Highlights, Breaking Changes, Fixes, Credits.
- Incident Report: Timeline, Impact, Root Cause, Remediation.
Confirm audience and required detail level.

Step 2: Format Findings (`structured-output:findings-formatted`)

Use consistent finding structure:

### [SEVERITY] Finding Title
**Location**: file.rs:123
**Anchor**: `verbatim source text copied from line 123`
**Category**: Security | Performance | Correctness | Style
**Description**: Brief explanation of the issue.
**Evidence**: [E1, E2] - Reference to evidence log.
**Recommendation**: Specific remediation steps.

Verification: Run the command with --help flag to verify availability.

Severity levels: CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW, INFO.
Order findings by severity, then by file location.
Anchor is mandatory and grounds the finding. Copy the exact source text at Location (not a paraphrase). It is what a second pass re-reads to confirm the finding is real. A finding whose anchor does not appear at its cited line is treated as a hallucination and dropped. The check is mechanical: imbue:review-core Step 6 runs plugins/imbue/scripts/citation_verifier.py over the findings.

Step 3: Assign Actions (`structured-output:actions-assigned`)

Convert findings to action items with assignee and priority:

## Action Items
- [ ] [HIGH] Fix SQL injection in auth.py:45 (@security-team, P1)
- [ ] [MEDIUM] Add input validation to API endpoint (@backend, P2)
- [ ] [LOW] Update deprecated dependency (@devops, P3)

Verification: Run the command with --help flag to verify availability.

Include owner assignment where known.
Add priority indicators (P1/P2/P3) for triage.
Note dependencies between actions.

Step 4: Attach Appendix (`structured-output:appendix-attached`)

Compile supporting materials:

## Appendix
### A. Commands Run
[Full evidence log from imbue:proof-of-work]

### B. External References
[Citations and documentation links]

### C. Raw Data
[Large outputs, full diffs, or data exports]

Verification: Run the command with --help flag to verify availability.

Keep main report concise; details in appendix.
validate appendix is navigable with clear section headers.

Output Quality Checklist

Before finalizing:

Every finding carries a verbatim Anchor the citation verifier resolved (no unverified findings ship).
All findings have evidence references.
Severity levels are justified.
Recommendations are specific and name the next step.
No orphaned sections or placeholder text.
Format renders correctly in target medium (GitHub, Confluence, etc.).

Exit Criteria

Todos completed with formatted deliverable.
Output follows selected template structure.
Stakeholders can act on findings without clarification.