performing-web-application-vulnerability-triage

name	performing-web-application-vulnerability-triage
description	Triage web application vulnerability findings from DAST/SAST scanners using OWASP risk rating methodology to separate true positives from false positives and prioritize remediation.
domain	cybersecurity
subdomain	vulnerability-management
tags	["web-application","vulnerability-triage","owasp","dast","sast","burp-suite","zap","false-positive","risk-rating"]
version	1.0
author	mahipal
license	Apache-2.0

Performing Web Application Vulnerability Triage

Overview

Web application vulnerability triage is the process of reviewing findings from DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing) and SAST (Static Application Security Testing) tools to validate true positives, dismiss false positives, assign risk ratings using the OWASP Risk Rating Methodology, and prioritize remediation. Effective triage reduces alert fatigue and focuses development teams on the vulnerabilities that matter most.

Prerequisites

• DAST scan results (OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, Acunetix)
• SAST scan results (Semgrep, SonarQube, Checkmarx, Snyk Code)
• Python 3.9+ with requests, beautifulsoup4
• Burp Suite Professional or OWASP ZAP for manual validation
• DefectDojo or similar for finding management

OWASP Risk Rating Methodology

Risk Calculation

Risk = Likelihood x Impact

Likelihood Factors (0-9 scale)

Factor Group	Factor	Description
Threat Agent	Skill Level	How technically skilled is the attacker?
Threat Agent	Motive	How motivated is the attacker?
Threat Agent	Opportunity	What resources/access are needed?
Threat Agent	Size	How large is the potential threat agent group?
Vulnerability	Ease of Discovery	How easy is it to find the vulnerability?
Vulnerability	Ease of Exploit	How easy is it to exploit?
Vulnerability	Awareness	How well known is the vulnerability?
Vulnerability	Intrusion Detection	How likely is exploitation to be detected?

Impact Factors (0-9 scale)

Factor Group	Factor	Description
Technical	Confidentiality	How much data could be disclosed?
Technical	Integrity	How much data could be corrupted?
Technical	Availability	How much service could be lost?
Technical	Accountability	Can actions be traced to attacker?
Business	Financial Damage	Revenue loss, regulatory fines
Business	Reputation Damage	Brand trust erosion
Business	Non-compliance	Regulatory violation exposure
Business	Privacy Violation	PII/PHI exposure volume

Risk Matrix

	Low Impact (0-3)	Medium Impact (3-6)	High Impact (6-9)
High Likelihood (6-9)	Medium	High	Critical
Medium Likelihood (3-6)	Low	Medium	High
Low Likelihood (0-3)	Note	Low	Medium

Triage Process

Step 1: Categorize by OWASP Top 10

OWASP_TOP_10_2021 = {
    "A01": "Broken Access Control",
    "A02": "Cryptographic Failures",
    "A03": "Injection",
    "A04": "Insecure Design",
    "A05": "Security Misconfiguration",
    "A06": "Vulnerable and Outdated Components",
    "A07": "Identification and Authentication Failures",
    "A08": "Software and Data Integrity Failures",
    "A09": "Security Logging and Monitoring Failures",
    "A10": "Server-Side Request Forgery",
}

CWE_TO_OWASP = {
    "CWE-79": "A03",   # XSS -> Injection
    "CWE-89": "A03",   # SQL Injection
    "CWE-78": "A03",   # OS Command Injection
    "CWE-352": "A01",  # CSRF -> Access Control
    "CWE-22": "A01",   # Path Traversal
    "CWE-200": "A02",  # Information Exposure
    "CWE-327": "A02",  # Weak Cryptography
    "CWE-287": "A07",  # Authentication Issues
    "CWE-918": "A10",  # SSRF
    "CWE-502": "A08",  
    : ,  
}

Step 2: Validate True vs False Positives

def triage_finding(finding):
    """Classify finding as true_positive, false_positive, or needs_review."""
    fp_indicators = [
        "Content-Security-Policy header not set",  # Often informational
        "X-Content-Type-Options header missing",    # Low severity header
        "Cookie without SameSite attribute",        # Context dependent
    ]

    for indicator in fp_indicators:
        if indicator.lower() in finding.get("title", "").lower():
            if finding.get("severity", "").lower() in ("info", "low"):
                return "false_positive", "Common informational finding"

    # Check for confirmed exploitation evidence
    if finding.get("evidence") and finding.get("confidence", "").lower() == "certain":
        return "true_positive", "Scanner confirmed exploitation"

    # SAST findings need manual code review
    if finding.get("source") == "sast":
        if finding.get("cwe") in ["CWE-89", "CWE-78", "CWE-79"]:
            return , 

     , 

Step 3: Risk Score Calculation

def calculate_risk_score(finding, app_context):
    """Calculate OWASP risk rating for a web application finding."""
    # Likelihood factors
    likelihood = {
        "skill_level": 6 if finding["cwe"] in ["CWE-89", "CWE-79"] else 4,
        "motive": 7,  # Financial gain
        "opportunity": 7 if finding.get("authenticated") == False else 4,
        "size": 9 if finding.get("internet_facing") else 4,
        "ease_of_discovery": 8 if finding.get("scanner_detected") else 5,
        "ease_of_exploit": 7 if finding.get("exploit_available") else 4,
        "awareness": 6,
        "intrusion_detection": 3 if app_context.get("waf_enabled") else 8,
    }

    # Impact factors
    impact = {
        "confidentiality":     finding.get(, [])  ,
        :   finding[]  [, ]  ,
        :     finding.get(, [])  ,
        :   app_context.get()  ,
        :   app_context.get()  ,
        :   app_context.get()  ,
        :   app_context.get()  ,
        :   app_context.get()  ,
    }

    likelihood_score = (likelihood.values()) / (likelihood)
    impact_score = (impact.values()) / (impact)
    risk_score = likelihood_score * impact_score

     risk_score >= :
        risk_level = 
     risk_score >= :
        risk_level = 
     risk_score >= :
        risk_level = 
     risk_score >= :
        risk_level = 
    :
        risk_level = 

     {
        : (likelihood_score, ),
        : (impact_score, ),
        : (risk_score, ),
        : risk_level,
    }

Step 4: Generate Triage Report

# Process DAST/SAST results through triage pipeline
python3 scripts/process.py \
  --input zap_results.json \
  --format zap \
  --app-context app_config.json \
  --output triage_report.json

Manual Validation Techniques

SQL Injection Validation

# Test parameter with single quote
GET /search?q=test' HTTP/1.1

# Test with boolean-based payload
GET /search?q=test' AND 1=1-- HTTP/1.1
GET /search?q=test' AND 1=2-- HTTP/1.1

# Time-based verification
GET /search?q=test'; WAITFOR DELAY '0:0:5'-- HTTP/1.1

XSS Validation

# Reflected XSS test
GET /search?q=<script>alert(document.domain)</script> HTTP/1.1

# Check if output is encoded
GET /search?q="><img src=x onerror=alert(1)> HTTP/1.1

# DOM-based XSS
GET /page#<img src=x onerror=alert(1)> HTTP/1.1

References

• OWASP Risk Rating Methodology
• OWASP Top 10 2021
• OWASP Testing Guide v4.2
• CWE/SANS Top 25