بنقرة واحدة
recipe-research
Multi-source recipe research with metric conversion and verification
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Multi-source recipe research with metric conversion and verification
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Search multiple job sources for new listings, spawn parallel triage agents, and update tracking state. Use when running /job-discover or searching for new job opportunities.
Staff-engineer-level ADR helper — interactive multi-round exploration that helps you deeply understand architecture decisions through codebase research, ASCII diagrams, and Socratic dialogue. Use when you want to understand an ADR ("explain this ADR", "help me understand this decision", "what does this mean", "walk me through this"), review it ("is this ADR good enough", "poke holes", "review this ADR"), or when sharing ADR file paths (docs/decisions/, docs/adr/, numbered files like 0014-*.md). Every round produces diagrams and ends with user-directed next steps.
Curate weekly newsletter from checked stories in daily AI digests. Extracts [x] marked items, groups into narrative themes, generates editorial newsletter.
Comprehensive grounded research with rigorous source verification. Use when user needs thorough research with verbatim citations, fact-checking verification, or academic-level source grounding on complex topics.
Interactive KubeCon CFP submission writer. Guides through topic selection, title crafting, abstract writing, and benefits section using acceptance data from 1,100+ talks across 7 KubeCon events (2024-2025). Use when preparing a conference talk proposal for KubeCon/CloudNativeCon, writing a CFP, or asking about KubeCon submission strategy.
Critique a Claude implementation plan before approving execution. Spawns parallel persona subagents (Skeptic, Architect, Verifier) to evaluate the plan against the codebase and return an Approve/Reject/Refine verdict with concrete refinements. Use when a plan has been generated (Plan Mode output, ExitPlanMode, pasted plan text, or plan file path) and needs review before code is written. Triggers on "critique this plan", "review this plan", "is this plan good", "poke holes in this plan", "should I approve this plan", or sharing a plan for evaluation.
| name | recipe-research |
| description | Multi-source recipe research with metric conversion and verification |
Research recipes from multiple sources, convert to metric, verify cooking science, calculate nutrition.
Default: Vegetarian — All recipes vegetarian unless --classic flag used.
Extract from $ARGUMENTS:
Examples:
beef bourguignon → searches "vegetarian beef bourguignon mushroom"pad thai --dietary gf → "vegetarian gluten-free pad thai"coq au vin --classic → "coq au vin chicken" (traditional)Perform 4-6 WebSearch queries targeting different angles:
Query patterns (auto-add "vegetarian" unless --classic):
1. "[dish] recipe" — general results
2. "[dish] recipe site:seriouseats.com OR site:bonappetit.com" — technique-focused
3. "[dish] recipe site:allrecipes.com OR site:food.com" — home cook versions
4. "[dish] recipe site:bbcgoodfood.com OR site:epicurious.com" — international perspective
5. "[dish] przepis site:jadlonomia.com OR site:rozkoszny.pl" — Polish vegetarian sources
6. "best [dish] recipe tips" — technique tips
7. "[dish] common mistakes" — what to avoid
From search results extract:
Analyze across sources to identify:
Create synthesized "best of" recipe combining:
Read metric-conversions.md KB for reference.
Convert ALL measurements:
Format: 200g (1⅔ cups) flour
Critical: Different ingredients have different densities:
Spawn verification agent:
Task tool:
subagent_type: general-purpose
prompt: |
Verify this recipe for cooking science accuracy:
[INSERT SYNTHESIZED RECIPE]
Check against verification-checklist.md criteria:
1. Temperature safety (internal temps for proteins)
2. Cooking times (realistic for dish type)
3. Ingredient ratios (hydration, salt %, acid balance)
4. Technique sequence (logical order, no missing steps)
5. Resting times (meat, dough, etc.)
Flag concerns with [CONCERN] tag and explanation.
Cross-reference with food science sources if needed.
Return: verification status + any concerns
WebSearch queries for nutrition:
Report:
Follow output-template.md format exactly. Write entire recipe in Polish.
Include:
Save to both locations:
findings/recipes/[dish-name-slugified].md — local archiveRecipe: [dish-name] in workspaceCreate directories if needed.
Use workspace conventions:
Before saving, verify: