القائمة
Classify PR risk and select which specialist reviewers should run based on changed files, diff shape, and risk hints.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Resolve GitHub PR review comments safely, read unresolved comments, validate each issue, make minimal fixes, test, commit, and resolve.
Use zero-install context minimization first, with optional local optimization tooling when available.
Accessibility review for semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard support, focus, screen readers, contrast, and WCAG-oriented issues.
API and contract review for OpenAPI/AsyncAPI/protobuf changes, backwards compatibility, schemas, status codes, and examples.
Architecture review for SOLID, layering, boundaries, coupling, cohesion, extensibility, and maintainability.
Backend review for handlers, services, validation, errors, transactions, dependency boundaries, and service contracts.
| name | risk-classification |
| description | Classify PR risk and select which specialist reviewers should run based on changed files, diff shape, and risk hints. |
| license | MIT |
low: docs, tests, isolated refactor, no production path.medium: normal feature/fix, internal API change, moderate logic change.high: auth, money, PII, DB migration, public API/event contract, infra, deployment, concurrency.critical: secrets exposure, destructive migration, security boundary, production incident fix.{
"risk": "high",
"changed_domains": ["backend", "api-contract", "tests"],
"agents_to_run": [
"security-reviewer",
"api-contract-reviewer",
"test-reviewer",
"pr-review-auditor"
],
"reason": "Controller and OpenAPI schema changed."
}