Roleplay community culture and player intent behind The BASICs chat features. Read before designing, defaulting, gating, or writing copy for any RP-facing surface. Captures how RP players actually use these features, which is often not inferable from the code.
Roleplay community culture and player intent behind The BASICs chat features. Read before designing, defaulting, gating, or writing copy for any RP-facing surface. Captures how RP players actually use these features, which is often not inferable from the code.
The BASICs is a roleplay mod. Most of its features look, from the code, like generic chat plumbing: ranges, channels, prefixes, toggles. The reasons players and server owners actually want them come from roleplay community culture, which is not derivable from the source and is easy to get subtly wrong while writing something that compiles, passes review, and ships.
An agent working here will understand roleplay conceptually. That is not the same as knowing the culture. This file records the specific cultural facts as they come up, so design decisions stop being re-derived (or re-guessed) each time.
Read this before:
adding or changing an RP-facing chat surface
choosing a default for anything player-visible
deciding whether a setting should exist, and at what granularity
writing player-facing copy or naming a channel, mode, or command
deciding whether two features that look similar should share a switch
When you learn something new about how players use this, add it here. That is the point of the file. The entries below are a growing list, not a complete one.
Entry 1: Global OOC and local OOC are different features
They look like the same feature at two ranges. They are not, and treating them as one is how you get a wrong config surface.
What each is actually for
Local OOC ((...), /ooc) is meta-commentary inside a scene. A player is mid-roleplay and needs to say something as themselves, to the people physically present: reacting to something that happened in-game, "brb", clarifying a confusing action, sorting out whose turn it is. It is tightly coupled to the scene and to the people in it. Range matters, because the audience is "the people I am currently roleplaying with".
Global OOC (((...)), /gooc) is roleplay coordination across the server. Announcing an adventure and looking for people to come along, asking if anyone is around to run a scene, organising. It works as a substitute for general chat, and it exists mainly because everyone is already looking at the roleplay tab. Range is irrelevant by definition.
Global OOC versus vanilla general chat
A player being deliberate about it will usually split these:
General chat: casual conversation, unrelated to the game world
Global OOC: out-of-character but roleplay-adjacent, coordination and logistics
Local OOC: meta-commentary inside a scene
The distinction between general chat and global OOC is soft and plenty of players do not observe it. But the split is real for the players who care, and it is why global OOC is not simply redundant with a channel the game already has.
Design consequences
Gate them independently. A server owner's reasons for disabling each are unrelated. Some owners consider global OOC too immersion-breaking and want that traffic in general chat instead. That reasoning says nothing about local OOC, which serves scene-level needs those same owners usually want to keep.
Do not let one setting gate both. During QA of #207 a guard was written that put global OOC behind the local OOC toggle. It compiled, it was defensible from the code, and it silently removed a working feature on servers that had disabled an unrelated setting.
Naming is genuinely ambiguous. "OOC" is used to mean local OOC on some servers and global OOC on others, and communities differ. Do not assume a bare "OOC" in a request, issue, or user report means local. Ask.
Entry 2: Server owners are a distinct persona with distinct motives
Config decisions on this mod are made by roleplay server administrators, not by the players using the feature. Their reasoning is frequently about protecting the fiction, not about performance, safety, or preference.
Examples of real motives behind toggles:
Disabling global OOC because it pulls players out of the world mid-scene
Requiring nicknames so account names never appear in character
Line-of-sight and range settings so private conversations stay private, which is a fiction-integrity concern before it is a privacy one
When choosing a default, ask what a roleplay server owner would want out of the box, not what is most permissive or most featureful. The default config for this mod deliberately leans feature-forward for RP servers (see docs/FEATURES.md, "Default Configuration Philosophy").
The granularity question
This recurs constantly and should be decided deliberately each time rather than by habit. For any given behavior there are up to three levels:
No config. The behavior just is what it is, or players self-select per message via a prefix.
Player preference. Each player chooses; the server does not care.
Server control, which is really two settings: the server default, and whether players may change it.
Default to the lowest level that solves the actual need. Adding config later is easy; removing config from a live mod is not. Level 3 is what RP servers with a house style eventually ask for, but "eventually asks for" is not the same as "needs now".
Entry 3: Two chat axes, and what they are called
As of #207 the mod has two independent axes, and the terminology was chosen carefully. Keep it consistent in code, copy, and docs.
Axis
Term
Values
Commands
How far it carries
chat mode
whisper, normal, yell
/whisper/say/yell
What kind of message
chat type
in character, emote, OOC, global OOC
/me/ooc/gooc
Rejected names, and why (do not revisit without new information):
"Volume" for the mode axis. Accurate today, but the modes are configurable and a server may repurpose them for something non-acoustic. The label would then assert something the mod does not guarantee.
"Channel" for the type axis. Collides with real chat channels, General and Proximity, which already exist and mean something else to players.
"Chat type" is deliberately bland. Its job is to stay out of the way while the values (in character, OOC) carry the meaning, because RP players already think fluently in IC/OOC.
Entry 4: Prefix syntax is muscle memory, and breaking it is expensive
RP players type *, (, (( thousands of times. These are not discoverable UI, they are motor habit built over years, often carried between servers and between games.
Consequences:
Changing what an existing prefix does is a breaking change, even when the new behavior is better. Weigh it as such.
Making a previously-erroring input do something is also a change. #207 made a bare /me park the player in emote mode where it used to be a harmless "missing argument" error. That is the intended feature, but on a server with years of muscle memory it is the most likely source of "the update broke chat" reports.
Prefer additive syntax (a new prefix like **) over redefining existing syntax.
Open questions worth resolving with players, not from first principles
Recorded so they are not silently answered by whoever touches the code next.
Should players be able to hide or mute OOC and global OOC locally? No such setting exists today. Argument against: players hiding active conversation is a recipe for confusion, where someone is talked to and never sees it.
Should a player-facing chat history exist showing what that player would have seen? Chat history today is permission-gated (ChatHistoryPermission, default commandplayer), so it is effectively an admin/staff surface rather than a player one.
What should the channel labels be? The [OOC] / [GOOC] prefixes are currently fixed strings. Server owners may want custom labels, shorter markers (a bare G), or no brackets. See the issue tracker.
Measurement
Product decisions here are currently made from intuition and a handful of Discord reports. The mod has a large installed base and an enormous amount of accumulated player typing time, and almost none of it is being measured.
An analytics system exists (src/ModSystems/Analytics/) with root-admin consent, three levels (off, server, personalized), and a repeating prompt. Treat verifying and using it as a first-class task, not a chore: the questions in this file (which chat types get used, which toggles get flipped, which commands get attempted while disabled) are answerable with data rather than argument.
Signals worth having, noted as they come up:
Attempts to use a command that a server has disabled. This is a specific argument for keeping such commands registered and refusing at execution rather than not registering them: an unregistered command produces no signal, no acknowledgement that the player typed the right thing, and no custom copy.
