القائمة
Request an automated review of the current pull request, address valid feedback, and repeat until approval. Use after opening a PR and before handing it to a human reviewer.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Ask Claude Code to make a taste-driven call on something ambiguous — UI polish, prose phrasing, naming, formatting. Use when you'd otherwise guess.
Prepare Hubble desktop releases using tag-triggered GitHub Releases. Use when cutting, automating, or explaining app releases, version bumps, tags, GitHub Actions publishing, Electron artifacts, or updater release management.
Review a pull request or local branch diff for correctness, security, lifecycle, error handling, tests, and meaningful performance risks. Use when asked to review PR changes, a branch, a commit range, or the current working tree and return a structured review.
Add a user-facing entry to CHANGELOG.md for work that just landed. Use when wrapping up a feature/fix, or when asked to record what changed. Called standalone or from the `done` skill.
Open a pull request for the current branch. Use whenever asked to make/create/open a PR.
Use when testing the Hubble Electron desktop app, especially when inspecting, clicking, screenshotting, or verifying a real note edit in the running app.
| name | request-pr-review |
| description | Request an automated review of the current pull request, address valid feedback, and repeat until approval. Use after opening a PR and before handing it to a human reviewer. |
Push the current changes. Use an existing Review Pull Requests review for the current HEAD, or trigger one with gh workflow run review-pull-requests.yml -f pr_number=<number> and wait for that SHA's review.
Address valid feedback, run relevant checks, commit, and push. Pushing does not request another review; trigger one manually and repeat until approved.
Do not accept feedback blindly. If the reviewer is wrong or the same concern repeats, explain the disagreement and stop for human judgment. Stop after three review rounds.
