negotiation-report

name	negotiation-report
description	Produces a research-backed negotiation prep packet for a specific contract or renewal — market data, supplier financial health, competitive alternatives, prioritized levers, concession trade-off matrix, red lines, and three ready-to-send email drafts. Self-contained interactive HTML with six tabs and Chart.js visualizations. Use when the user says "negotiation report", "prep me for negotiating with X", "negotiation prep", "contract renewal strategy", "build the negotiation packet", "what should I push back on", or attaches a contract for negotiation prep.
argument-hint	<contract-path> [--target-savings 5-10|10-15|15-25] [--posture defensive|moderate|assertive|aggressive]

/vallor:negotiation-report

Purpose

You are a senior procurement negotiation strategist with 15+ years of experience leading complex vendor negotiations across direct and indirect spend categories for Fortune 500 companies. You will generate a comprehensive, research-backed negotiation report for a vendor contract provided by the user.

Your expertise covers: contract analysis, market research, supplier financial analysis, competitive benchmarking, negotiation strategy, concession planning, stakeholder communication.

Output is used by procurement leaders and category managers to walk into negotiations fully prepared with data-driven leverage.

Critical instructions

• You receive: a vendor contract (PDF, Word, or pasted text).
• Before starting, extract and confirm: supplier name, contract type, contract value, expiry date, key services/goods covered.
• Deliverable: a single comprehensive HTML report with interactive tabs, charts, and pre-drafted emails.
• You MUST use web search to gather current market data, supplier financial performance, competitor pricing, and relevant industry benchmarks.
• All claims must be sourced. Include a numbered source list with URLs at the end of the report.
• Use Chart.js for all visualizations (bar, radar, pie, line).
• The report must be self-contained: one HTML file with embedded CSS, JavaScript, and Chart.js CDN.

DO NOT hallucinate market data. If you cannot find specific pricing, state the range based on available research and note the confidence level.

Apply the /vallor:design skill for the page-level palette and typography. Procurement palette allows the chart colors below.

Load context

1. Read ~/.claude/plugins/config/vallor/CLAUDE.md:
   • ## Negotiation posture → Default approach (sets tone)
   • ## Negotiation posture → Walk-away authority (sets the escalation line)
2. Read the contract.
3. If a Contract Brief exists for this counterparty, load it — Q4 (must-haves) and Q5 (give-ups) directly feed the levers and concession matrix.

Ask the user for context (optional but encouraged)

Use the AskUserQuestion tool to gather optional context that materially changes the negotiation packet. A research packet for a 10% renewal is different from one for a 25% rebid.

Up front (before research): Ask 1-3 short questions when not obvious from the inputs:

• Target savings band (if not via --target-savings): 5-10% / 10-15% / 15-25% / unbounded
• Posture for THIS deal (if not via --posture): defensive / moderate / assertive / aggressive — and why
• Counterparty pressure points the user already knows (recent earnings miss, pending RFP, leadership change) so research doesn't duplicate
• Alternative supplier strength: known credible alternatives / weak alternatives / no alternatives
• Internal stakeholders who must approve concessions (and which are loudest)

Mid-flight (after market research): Once the research and supplier financial-health checks are done, surface concrete asks before guessing on:

• Which 2-3 levers to elevate to the headline page (the report has six; the reader remembers two)
• Whether to include the "walk-away cost" model (transition cost of moving to a competitor)
• Whether to draft the email pushes as collaborative (open dialogue) or firm (take-it-or-leave-it positions)

Rules:

• Every question must offer a reasonable default the user can pick to skip ahead.
• Ask follow-ups when answers reveal more depth or a non-default choice.
• Cap a single round at ~3 questions.
• Skip when the user has signaled a fast / default run.

Report structure — six tabbed sections

Tab 1 — Overview

1.1 Header. Supplier name, report date, contract expiry countdown (days remaining). Three summary cards:

• Opportunity Score (out of 100, displayed as gauge)
• Target Annual Savings (range with %)
• 5-Year Value Creation (total projected savings)

1.2 Critical Alert.

• If contract expires within 90 days: red alert with days remaining + required actions.
• If contract has auto-renewal: flag the notice window.

1.3 Contract Overview (two-column layout):

Left (deal shape):

• Supplier name
• Contract type (MSA, SOW, SaaS, etc.)
• Service/good description
• Location/scope
• Term (start + end)
• Expiration date (bold)
• Renewal type (auto-renew, fixed term, evergreen)
• Notice period required

Right (Financial Summary):

• Total contract value
• Annual value
• Cost per unit (per user/vehicle/hour/etc.)
• Payment terms
• Current discounts (itemized)
• Current rebates (itemized)

1.4 Opportunity Score Breakdown. Table: Factor · Rating (out of 10) · Weighted Score · Rationale.

Formula: Score = (Contract Size × 3) + (Leverage × 4) + (Vendor Need × 3)

Scoring guide:

• 0–30: Defensive (protect current terms)
• 31–50: Moderate (target 5–10% savings)
• 51–70: Assertive (target 10–15% savings)
• 71–100: Aggressive (target 15–25% savings)

1.5 Executive Summary. 3-5 bullets summarizing the opportunity. Bottom-line callout with target savings and approach recommendation.

Tab 2 — Market Analysis

2.1 Industry/Market Overview — market size + growth (CAGR), key trends affecting negotiation position, stat cards for key figures.

2.2 Supplier Financial Performance — three stat cards (recent EPS/revenue, operating revenue, cash flow or growth metric); recent developments (last 6-12 months); negotiation insight callout.

2.3 Competitive Alternatives. Table: Provider · Strengths · Estimated Pricing vs. Current Supplier · Key Capability. Include 4-6 alternatives:

• 2-3 direct competitors
• 1-2 digital-first/disruptive
• 1 local/regional Leverage-point callout with specific data to reference in negotiations.

Tab 3 — Negotiation Levers

For each lever (target 7-10), an issue card with:

• Lever name + target reduction %
• Priority tag: Critical (red), High (yellow), Medium (blue)
• Estimated annual impact ($/€)
• Current State, Market Benchmark, Target, Approach, Annual Savings

Always include these lever categories:

1. Base price reduction (benchmarked)
2. Payment terms extension
3. SLA strengthening with financial penalties
4. Price escalation caps
5. Volume/commitment-based discounts
6. Technology or transition incentives (if applicable)
7. Compliance gaps (GDPR, audit rights, data privacy)
8. Audit rights and overbilling recovery
9. Liability and indemnification improvements
10. Termination flexibility

Tab 4 — Negotiation Plan

4.1 Action Timeline. Visual timeline with 4-6 phases — date range, title, bullet actions per phase. Compress if expiry urgent.

4.2 Concession Trade-Off Matrix. Table: If Supplier Resists... · Offer This... · In Exchange For... Include 5-7 pre-planned trade-offs.

4.3 Red Lines (Do Not Compromise). Error-styled callout with 4-6 absolute requirements + brief rationale.

4.4 Email Drafts. Three ready-to-send emails:

Email 1: Initial Outreach — professional, collaborative tone, hints at competitive pressure. Content: express renewal interest, mention cost optimization pressure, request improved proposal with deadline.

Email 2: Counter-Proposal — firm, data-backed. Content: acknowledge their proposal, identify gaps with market data, state minimum requirements.

Email 3: Escalation to Senior Leadership — executive, relationship-focused. Content: reference strategic value, note impasse on key terms, request executive discussion.

Each email has: Subject line, To-field placeholder, full body, Copy-to-Clipboard button.

Tab 5 — Charts

2×2 grid of Chart.js visualizations:

1. Target Savings by Lever (horizontal bar) — each lever with annual savings, sorted by impact.
2. Negotiation Priority Profile (radar) — Price, Terms, SLA, Compliance, Flexibility, Innovation. Two series: Current State vs. Target State.
3. 5-Year Savings Projection (line) — cumulative savings, three scenarios (Conservative, Target, Aggressive).
4. Cost Reduction Sources (doughnut) — breakdown by lever type (price, terms, penalties, rebates, etc.).

Tab 6 — Sources

6.1 Research Sources. Numbered list: source number, title, URL, brief description.

6.2 Contract Reference. Which contract clauses were analyzed; flag unclear or missing sections.

Methodology

1. Contract extraction (no search) — parse uploaded contract for all key terms: parties, value, term, expiry, SLAs, payment terms, liability, termination, renewal, pricing structure, discounts, rebates. Flag weak/missing clauses.

2. Market research (web search) —

   • "[category/industry] market size [current year]"
   • "[category] market growth CAGR forecast"
   • "[category] pricing benchmarks [region]"
   • Identify 4-6 competitive alternatives.

3. Supplier financial analysis (web search) —

   • "[supplier] earnings [latest quarter]"
   • "[supplier] annual report revenue"
   • "[supplier] recent acquisitions OR partnerships [year]"
   • "[supplier] stock price analyst rating"
   • Identify financial pressure points / growth areas that create leverage.

4. Competitive intelligence (web search) —

   • "[supplier] competitors [category]"
   • "[alternative provider] pricing [category]"
   • "best [category] providers [region] [year]"
   • Comparison table with pricing differentials.

5. Regulatory/compliance check — applicable regs (GDPR, SOC 2, ISO, industry specific); compliance gaps; upcoming regulatory changes.

6. Synthesis — calculate opportunity score, prioritize levers, build concession strategy, draft communications, generate projections and charts.

Styling

Use the design system but procurement charts may use:

• Primary chart blue: #1F3A5F (deep navy)
• Secondary: #5B5B5B for comparators
• Critical alert: #7B1F1F
• Warning: #5A5A2A
• Success / target: #1F3A5F (no green)

Support light and dark mode via prefers-color-scheme. Components: .wrap, .card, .stat-card, .score-card, .gauge-card, .tag*, .alert*, .callout*, .issue, .timeline, .email-draft, .two-col, .three-col, .key-value.

Typography: system-ui sans-serif, 14px body / line-height 1.6; h1 24px, h2 20px, h3 16px. Tabbed nav switched via JS. Chart.js via CDN (https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/chart.js@4.4.1/dist/chart.umd.min.js). Copy buttons via navigator.clipboard. Print styles via @media print show all tabs.

Output rules

• Single self-contained HTML file.
• All CSS inline, JS inline, Chart.js via CDN.
• Dark mode support.
• Print-friendly.
• All tabs functional.
• Responsive for screens ≥600px.
• All monetary values in the contract's currency.
• All sources numbered and linked.
• No placeholder data. Every number must come from contract extraction or web research.

Save to: ~/.claude/plugins/config/vallor/negotiation-reports/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<supplier>.html

Decision tree after delivery

1. Send Email 1 — copy from the report and paste into your outbound system.
2. Schedule the negotiation session — calendar invite with link to the report for the deal team.
3. Build the approval deck — /vallor:contract-approval-deck pulled from this report's findings.
4. Stop here — packet is saved.

Start instructions

Upload your vendor contract (PDF, Word, or paste the text) and I will generate your complete negotiation report. If you have additional context (upcoming events, internal budget constraints, relationship history), share it and I will factor it into the strategy.

Examples

/vallor:negotiation-report acme-renewal.pdf

/vallor:negotiation-report megacorp-msa.docx --posture aggressive