القائمة
Use this skill when the user says "/sni", "ayúdame con el SNI", "SNII application", or "help me apply to SNI". Guides a researcher through organizing evidence for a Mexican SNII application: intake, gap analysis, folder setup, and ongoing document filing.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Help a researcher organize and complete their application to Mexico's Sistema Nacional de Investigadoras e Investigadores (SNII). This skill is fully self-contained and works for any researcher at any career stage.
Privacy rule — enforce this always: Do not save, store, or write any personal researcher information to memory files, CLAUDE.md, or any persistent location. Every session starts fresh. This skill is shared across many users.
At the start of each session, read all documents from this skill's docs/ folder:
docs/Convocatoria_2026_Reconocimiento_SNII.pdf — eligibility rules, deadlines, application portaldocs/Criterios-Especificos-de-Evaluacion-SNII.pdf — evaluation criteria, component minimums, evidence requirements by level and áreadocs/preguntas_rizoma.md — the 9 Rizoma narrative questions with bullet-point guidance for eachUse these to answer all questions about requirements. Do not rely on training data alone — read the actual documents.
Send one message asking all of the following:
Continue the entire session in the researcher's chosen language after this point.
If the researcher provides a file path, use the Read tool to open it. If they paste text, work from that directly.
Extract and note (in-session only — do not save to any file):
Read the criterios document. Cross-reference the researcher's profile against the quantitative minimums and evidence requirements for their stated level and área (found in Anexo 1 of the criterios).
Present a structured gap analysis with three sections:
Componente 1 — Producción Científica
Componente 2 — Fortalecimiento y Consolidación de la Comunidad
Componente 3 — Divulgación
Also flag any eligibility issues (e.g., private institution without Secihti convenio, missing PhD title, nationality questions) — note the issue and recommend they consult Secihti or a legal specialist. Do not give legal advice.
In the researcher's current working directory, create the following folder structure:
evidencias/
0_elegibilidad/
1_produccion_cientifica/
2_fortalecimiento_comunidad/
docencia/
peer_review/
desarrollo_institucional/
3_divulgacion/
prensa/
conferencias/
redes_sociales/
For each confirmed publication, create a numbered subfolder under 1_produccion_cientifica/ using the format:
NN_JournalAbbrev_YEAR_keyword/
(e.g., 01_PNAS_2025_rebuttals/, 02_LAPS_2024_cosmopolitans/)
Create a TODO.md in the working directory tracking what's filed and what's still needed, organized by component.
Once evidence is organized, offer to help draft answers to the 9 Rizoma narrative questions. Read docs/preguntas_rizoma.md for the bullet-point guidance for each question.
evidencias/ folderAs the researcher adds documents to the working directory, proactively:
Source_YYYY-MM-DD_description.pdf
(e.g., PNAS_2025-11-04_aceptacion_provisional.pdf)evidencias/ subfolder using shell tools.TODO.md to mark the item as filed.Flag any document that is insufficient (missing signature, wrong format, only a conditional acceptance without a final one, etc.) and explain exactly what's needed.
Once evidence is filed and questions are drafted, prompt the researcher to export and share their Perfil Único:
"Estamos casi listos. Por favor descarga tu Perfil Único de Rizoma (botón 'Descargar Perfil Único' en la parte superior de tu solicitud) y compártelo aquí — ya sea la ruta del archivo o arrastrándolo a la ventana. Lo revisaré para identificar qué ya está registrado, qué le falta probatorio y qué no está aún capturado en el sistema."
"We're almost done. Please export your Perfil Único from Rizoma (the 'Descargar Perfil Único' button at the top of your application) and share it here — file path or drop it in. I'll check what's registered, what's missing a probatorio document, and what hasn't been entered yet."
Read the PDF and check for:
evidencias/ and what's in the systemReport findings as a bullet list:
| Evidence type | Sufficient for SNI? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Published article PDF | Yes (as production item) | Still need acceptance or dictamen |
| Carta de aceptación (unconditional) | Yes | Best option |
| Carta de aceptación (conditional) + published PDF | Yes | Condition was met |
| Dictamen de arbitraje (peer review reports) | Yes | Explicitly listed in Anexo 3 |
| Evidencia de normativa de la revista | Yes | Journal's stated peer review policy |
| Constancia de docencia (membretada, firmada) | Yes | Must be from the teaching institution |
| Generic email from department | No | Must be on letterhead, signed, dated |
| Press article (link or PDF) | Yes (divulgación) | Add URL |
| Certificate from conference/event | Yes (divulgación) | Must state your role |
| Social media thread with screenshot | Yes if explicitly general-audience | Cite URL; hilo en X counts |
| R&R letter | Partial | Lists as "en proceso"; less weight than published |
docs/ may be outdated.