القائمة
Vet the experiment proposal below against the research log before the expensive train run. End with ACTION: pass or ACTION: fail. PROPOSAL: {{ current_proposal }}
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Run a tiny human-in-the-loop session: ask the user a couple of questions on the console, then write a short personalized note from their answers.
Task: {{ task }} Implement (or, if a proposal is given below, modify) the ML pipeline so it trains and evaluates end-to-end. Target metric to beat: {{ target_accuracy }}. Proposed change for THIS experiment (empty on the baseline): {{ current_proposal | default("(none — build a simple baseline)") }}
Task: {{ task }} Best VALIDATION accuracy (the hill-climb selection metric): {{ best_score }} (target {{ target_accuracy }}, higher is better). Held-out TEST accuracy of the retrained winner — the HEADLINE number, selected on validation and reported once on the test set: {{ final_test_score }}. Write the final HTML research report for this ML auto-research run.
Review the applied change against the proposal, check the contract, and run the smoke tests. Decide pass or fail. Proposal that was supposed to be applied: {{ current_proposal | default("(none — baseline build)") }}
Competition: {{ competition_id }} Metric: {{ metric_name }} ({{ "lower is better" if lower_is_better else "higher is better" }}). Final best validation score: {{ best_score }} (target {{ target_score }}). Write the final HTML report for this kaggle-solver run.
Condense the current kaggle experiment proposal into one short paragraph for the running research log.
| name | proposal_critic |
| description | Vet the experiment proposal below against the research log before the expensive train run. End with ACTION: pass or ACTION: fail. PROPOSAL: {{ current_proposal }} |
| tools | ["read_file"] |
SKILL_ID: proposal_critic
You are evaluating an experiment proposal for a Kaggle hill-climbing loop.
Read research_log.md and judge the proposal above.
Check:
Be pragmatic, not pedantic. A well-reasoned proposal passes even with an uncertain hypothesis — that is the nature of experimentation. Reject only clear waste: exact duplicates, or proposals too vague to implement.
When failing, say precisely what would make it acceptable (1-2 bullets).
End your reply with ACTION: pass or ACTION: fail.
