pre-compact

name	pre-compact
description	Pre-compaction housekeeping. Walks a checklist (persistent memory updates, git hygiene, trash cleanup) plus an open-judgment audit, produces an SBAR with a go/no-go recommendation, and emits a copy-pasteable resume prompt for the post-compaction agent if work remains. Run this immediately before /compact.
model	opus

Pre-Compact - Session Housekeeping Before Compaction

The user is about to run /compact. Compaction destroys conversation context. Anything important from this session that is not persisted somewhere durable — memory files, commits, tickets, code, the issue tracker — is lost.

This skill is the last-chance pass to capture session state. Walk a fixed checklist as a floor, then use judgment for anything the checklist does not anticipate, and end with an SBAR-formatted go/no-go report.

Philosophy

• Persist before you compact. If a fact will matter next session, it goes into persistent memory now. If a change should be in the project, it gets committed (with permission). If an artifact is trash, it gets deleted.
• Surface uncertainty instead of guessing. When unsure whether something is trash, abandoned, or important, ask the user.
• Bias toward asking, not committing. Never commit on the user's behalf without per-invocation permission. Standing rules from CLAUDE.md still apply.
• The checklist is a floor, not a ceiling. Walk every item, but also use judgment to spot session-specific cleanup the checklist cannot anticipate.
• Do not invoke /compact yourself. Compaction is the user's call.

Workflow

1. Persistent memory pass

Updating persistent memory is the core reason this skill exists. The user invokes /pre-compact because they want memory written before compaction. Do not skip this step or treat it as conditional. Follow whatever memory conventions are documented in the user's global or project CLAUDE.md (auto-memory directory, project notes, etc.).

Re-scan the session for facts worth saving across conversations. Look for:

• About the user: role, expertise, preferences, current focus
• Feedback: corrections received OR non-obvious approaches the user confirmed worked. Capture the why the user gave, not just the rule.
• Project state: ongoing initiatives, constraints, deadlines, decisions, stakeholder context. Convert relative dates to absolute ones.
• External references: pointers to issue trackers, dashboards, channels, docs the user mentioned

For each candidate:

• Check existing memory files first. Update an existing memory rather than writing a duplicate.
• Skip anything already saved, derivable from git log / current code, or ephemeral to this conversation.
• Honor the exclusion rules in the user's memory instructions (architecture, conventions, fix recipes, ephemeral state).

2. Git hygiene pass

Run git status and assess:

• Uncommitted intentional changes: surface them. Ask the user whether to commit. If yes, draft a commit message and ask for approval before running git commit.
• Uncommitted in-progress changes: surface them. The filesystem survives compaction, so the files are not at risk — but the context about what is in flight may be. Either commit as WIP, or capture the in-flight state in the SBAR.
• Untracked files: route each to step 3 (trash) or surface as work product that should be tracked.
• Branch state: note any unusual condition (detached HEAD, mid-rebase, mid-merge, conflicts) so the user is aware before compacting.

Do not commit or stage on the user's behalf without explicit per-invocation permission. Match the scope of any granted permission exactly.

3. Trash cleanup pass

Identify candidate trash:

• Untracked scratch files created during this session (/tmp/*, *.bak, ad-hoc test scripts, debug dumps)
• Files matching obvious throwaway patterns (scratch.*, debug.*, tmp_*, nohup.out)
• Stray build artifacts that should have been gitignored

For each candidate:

• Clearly trash and clearly mine: delete and report.
• Ambiguous origin or intent: ask the user. When in doubt, do not delete.
• Not mine: leave alone.

A false delete loses the user's work-in-progress. A false retain costs nothing. Bias accordingly.

4. Open audit (judgment)

Walk the session and look for anything else that would be hard to reconstruct from git log + persistent memory + the issue tracker after compaction. Examples (non-exhaustive — the point of this step is to think past the checklist):

• Decisions made during the session that are not captured in any ticket, commit message, code comment, or memory
• Pending TODOs from the conversation that have no durable home
• Open threads with the user — questions asked but not answered, options proposed but not chosen
• Work-in-progress with no plan/task/ticket capturing the current state
• Long-running background processes (run_in_background tasks, dev servers, watchers) that the user may have forgotten about
• Active worktrees, stashes, or branches that need a decision before context is lost

For each item: either persist it now (memory, ticket, comment) or flag it explicitly in the SBAR.

5. Produce SBAR

Per the user's session handoff format:

• Situation: state of the working tree, repo, and any in-flight work right now
• Background: what was tried this session, what was rejected, what surprised
• Assessment: what you believe is true, calibrated by confidence — verified (ran the command, read the file), inferred (reasoned from observation), or recalled (training knowledge, possibly stale)
• Recommendation: exactly one of:
  • Safe to compact. All housekeeping done, nothing material at risk.
  • Safe to compact after [X]. A small action remains for the user (commit a staged change, answer a pending question); after that, compaction is fine.
  • Do not compact yet — [Y]. Genuine blocker. Compaction would lose load-bearing context that has not been captured.

Keep each field tight — one to three lines. The user reads this returning to a stale tmux pane, and may also use it to brief the post-compaction version of the session.

6. Produce resume prompt

The post-compaction agent reads the lossy summary, not the live conversation. A resume prompt drafted now, while full context is still in scope, is far higher-quality than what that agent could reconstruct from the summary. Always emit one of two outputs in this step — never silently skip it, since absence is ambiguous.

If there is pending work the next turn should pick up, emit a single fenced block the user can copy clean into the next prompt. The block must be:

• For Claude, not the user. Imperative, technical register. Not conversational.
• Self-contained. Name files with line numbers, decisions already made, constraints already negotiated, and the next concrete step. Do not write "continue where we left off" — write "edit path/to/file.py:42 to do Y, then run Z."
• Singular. One next action, not a menu. If multiple threads are open, pick the load-bearing one here and let the SBAR's Recommendation field flag the others.

If there is no pending work, emit exactly this line and nothing else in this step:

No resume prompt — work is sealed.

7. Stop

Wait for the user. Do not run /compact. Do not start new implementation work — this skill exists to seal the session, not to extend it.