بنقرة واحدة
superpowers-verification-before-completion
About to say done, fixed, or passing? STOP. Load first, show real evidence.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
About to say done, fixed, or passing? STOP. Load first, show real evidence.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Got a spec or requirements for a multi-step task? Load first, before touching code.
Sync this port with upstream obra/superpowers or Reasonix main-v2: detect drift, re-port, bench-gate
Building a feature or starting from an idea? STOP. Load first for an approved design before code.
Executing a written plan step-by-step in this session, with checkpoints? Load this first.
Branch finished, tests green? Load first to merge, PR, or clean up.
Got review feedback? Load BEFORE changing anything — verify each point, push back if wrong.
| name | superpowers-verification-before-completion |
| description | About to say done, fixed, or passing? STOP. Load first, show real evidence. |
Claiming work complete without verification = dishonesty, not efficiency.
Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.
Break the letter = break the spirit.
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
Haven't run the verification command in this message? Cannot claim it passes.
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete) via bash
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|---|---|---|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Subagent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Subagent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler |
| "Subagent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words, rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
Tests:
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
Build:
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
Requirements:
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
Subagent delegation:
✅ Subagent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust subagent report
ALWAYS before:
Applies to: exact phrases, paraphrases, synonyms, implications of success, ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness.
No shortcuts for verification.
Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.
Non-negotiable.