القائمة
Run the proofreading protocol on project files. Checks grammar, typos, overflow, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
| name | proofread |
| description | Run the proofreading protocol on project files. Checks grammar, typos, overflow, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
| argument-hint | [filename or 'all'] |
Run the proofreading protocol on papers, slides, notes, or other written content. Produces a report of all issues found WITHOUT editing any source files.
Identify files to review:
$ARGUMENTS is a specific filename: review that file only$ARGUMENTS is "all": review all .tex, .qmd, and .md files in the projectFor each file, launch the proofreader agent that checks for:
GRAMMAR: Subject-verb agreement, articles (a/an/the), prepositions, tense consistency TYPOS: Misspellings, search-and-replace artifacts, duplicated words OVERFLOW: Overfull hbox (LaTeX), content exceeding slide boundaries (Quarto) CONSISTENCY: Citation format, notation, terminology ACADEMIC QUALITY: Informal language, missing words, awkward constructions
Produce a detailed report for each file listing every finding with:
Save each report to quality_reports/FILENAME_proofread_report.md
IMPORTANT: Do NOT edit any source files. Only produce the report. Fixes are applied separately after user review.
Present summary to the user:
Build the T32 grant proposal as PDF and/or Word. Supports full build, Word-only, PDF-only, or single-section Word export for collaborator review.
Full grant review pipeline — runs compliance checker, study section reviewer, and proofreader on the T32 proposal. Aggregates all results into a single summary report.
Compile the LaTeX manuscript. Runs latexmk (or multi-pass pdflatex + biber) from the project root and reports errors, warnings, and undefined references.
Challenge academic content with 5-7 specific pedagogical questions. Checks ordering, prerequisites, gaps, alternatives, notation conflicts, cognitive load, and standalone readiness. Works on slides, lecture notes, paper drafts, and assignments.
Run holistic pedagogical review on teaching materials — slides, lecture notes, assignments, or syllabi. Checks narrative arc, prerequisites, worked examples, notation clarity, and pacing.
Run the R code review protocol on R scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, data.table conventions, domain correctness, and professional standards. Produces a report without editing files.