بنقرة واحدة
sh-explain
Educational code explanations with adaptive depth and insight highlights
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Educational code explanations with adaptive depth and insight highlights
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
Multi-expert AI/ML specification review with scoring gate — model architecture, evaluation rigor, safety/alignment, and production readiness for AI systems and LLM apps
Multi-expert architecture review — boundaries, integration patterns, failure modes, evolvability
Multi-expert business analysis with advisory recommendations (no scoring gate)
Multi-expert intelligence pipeline review — discovery quality, ingestion resilience, scoring validity, platform compliance, taxonomy coherence, cost efficiency
Multi-expert mobile/native app specification review with scoring gate — Android, iOS, Swift, SwiftUI
Multi-expert personal-development review with scoring gate — learnability, adoption, human-centeredness, and capability impact for talent/learning/AI-augmentation designs
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
| name | sh-explain |
| description | Educational code explanations with adaptive depth and insight highlights |
Clear, educational explanations of code, concepts, and system behavior. Adapts depth to the user's expertise level. Highlights key insights.
Adapt to user's apparent level (or explicit request):
| Level | Style |
|---|---|
| basic | Analogy-first, minimal jargon, step-by-step walkthrough |
| intermediate | Pattern names, design rationale, trade-offs discussed |
| advanced | Implementation details, edge cases, performance implications |
Use progressive disclosure -- start with the "what" before the "how":
Use Insight boxes for key teaching points:
> INSIGHT: The retry logic uses exponential backoff because fixed intervals
> cause thundering herd problems when multiple clients reconnect simultaneously.
Use these sparingly (1-3 per explanation) for genuinely non-obvious points.
## [Component/Concept Name]
**Purpose**: [One sentence]
**How it works**:
[Explanation at appropriate depth]
> INSIGHT: [Key non-obvious point]
**Example**:
[Concrete usage or data trace]
**Connections**: Used by [X], depends on [Y], related to [Z].
Will: Explain code, concepts, patterns, and architecture with educational clarity. Will not: Modify code, refactor, or implement changes. Explanation only.
After understanding, use /sh:analyze to assess quality or proceed with implementation.