القائمة
Harden and run tests for the current implementation using issue, architecture, diff, or user request as evidence. Writes test evidence to .context/test.md and hands naturally to /docs.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
| name | test |
| description | Harden and run tests for the current implementation using issue, architecture, diff, or user request as evidence. Writes test evidence to .context/test.md and hands naturally to /docs. |
Read the shared contracts before output: ../_shared/operator-output.md, ../_shared/attention-budget.md, ../_shared/evidence-record.md, ../_shared/state.md, ../_shared/cognitive-load.md, ../_shared/collaboration.md.
Prove the changed behavior and add only tests that would catch real failure modes.
Current diff, commits, user request, issue, .context/work.md, architecture/review artifacts, or any subset of those.
Changed files, existing tests, package scripts, issue/PR context, .context/ artifacts, and relevant docs.
.context/test.md.context/session-state.md.context/test.md.Return the verification decision, up to three evidence bullets with commands/results, remaining risk, and next action. Suggest /docs when behavior/config/API changed; otherwise suggest /pr.
Stop if tests expose a production bug, the implementation contradicts the contract, or the environment cannot run the required proof.
Apply Emil Kowalski-style UI polish: interaction details, component feel, animation restraint, and invisible product quality. Uses progressive disclosure instead of long design essays.
Apply Emil Kowalski-style animation guidance for web interfaces: purposeful motion, correct easing, interruptibility, performance, reduced motion, and interaction feel.
Implement the requested change on the current branch using the best available contract: issue, architecture, user request, or repo evidence. Does not require /architect or /review to have run. Hands naturally to /test.
Triage and address PR review comments. Uses available issue/architecture/context when present, keeps evidence in .context/address.md, and does not require prior workflow phases.
Derive the smallest correct architecture from user intent, repo facts, and available workflow evidence. Writes the full architecture to .context/architecture.md and returns only the decision, tradeoff, risk, and next action.
Review the current PR for correctness, tests, maintainability, security, standards, and prior-findings risk. Keeps reviewer detail in .context/code-review.md and posts concise actionable GitHub review comments.