القائمة
Consented agent-driven product check-in (pulse + portrait) with enable and consent gates, minimized local ledger attach, and private GitHub sink submit. Defaults off.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Greptile / bot reviewer response and PR-shepherding workflow. Use when running a review cycle or babysitting a PR to merge-ready -- audit process prerequisites, fetch bot findings, fix all issues in a single batch commit, and exit cleanly when no P0 or P1 issues remain. Supersedes Cursor global babysit on Deft-managed repos (#2261).
Parallel local agent orchestration. Use when running multiple agents on story-level xBRIEFs simultaneously — to scan active/ for allocatable work, set up isolated worktrees, launch agents with proven prompts, monitor progress, handle stalled review cycles, and close out PRs cleanly.
Build a project from scope xBRIEFs following Deft Directive framework standards. Use after deft-directive-setup has generated the project definition, or when the user has story xBRIEFs in xbrief/active/ ready to implement. Handles scaffolding, implementation, testing, and quality checks phase by phase.
Iterative pre-PR quality improvement loop. Use before pushing a branch for PR creation -- after completing implementation but before task check. Cycles through Read-Write-Lint-Diff until a full pass produces zero changes.
Evaluate an article, paper, or post for lessons that could improve directive. Analyzes two axes: how concepts improve directive's own implementation, and how they improve the projects directive creates. Produces filtered suggestions, iterates with the user, and optionally creates GitHub issues on the directive repo. Use when evaluating an article, paper, post, or URL for directive improvements, or when the user says "analyze this article", "evaluate this article", or "what can we learn from this for directive".
Systematic, evidence-based root-cause investigation. Use when the user asks "why did X break / slow down / regress?", wants to debug a failure, run a forensic investigation, or find the root cause of a bug -- to enter a sustained investigation MODE with a claim ledger, mandatory falsification before any conclusion, a chat answer-embargo until evidence closes, and a deterministic validator gate. Triggers: "debug", "root cause", "investigate", "why did X break", "why is X slow", "systematic debugging", "forensic".
| name | deft-directive-product-signal |
| description | Consented agent-driven product check-in (pulse + portrait) with enable and consent gates, minimized local ledger attach, and private GitHub sink submit. Defaults off. |
Agent-driven qualitative product-improvement signal for partner/trial installs. Lightweight interview, minimized local summaries (value/health/helped), optional skillsSummary hook — submits to private deftai/product-signal when enable + consent gates pass.
Legend (from RFC2119): !=MUST, ~=SHOULD, ≉=SHOULD NOT, ⊗=MUST NOT, ?=MAY.
product check-in, product pulse, partner feedback, or product signalplan.policy.productSignalplan.policy.productSignal.enabled MUST be true (task policy:show --field=productSignal)task product-signal:status)deftai/product-signal (#2767)plan.policy.productSignal.sinkRepo; mismatch soft-skips as sink-unconsentedenabled is falsetask product-signal:status
task policy:show -- --field=productSignal
When enabled, interactive, and consent missing/revoked, ask:
May we collect usage metrics and related session signal from this install to improve Directive? This can include a short check-in plus minimized local summaries (value/health and related ledgers). Nothing is sent while this path is off or without your consent.
If you are unsure, please check with your company before saying no — they are a Directive partner and may already expect this signal to be shared.
Reply yes to consent, or no to decline.
task product-signal:consent -- --grant (pass --project-root when using a custom sinkRepo); continuetask product-signal:submit -- --surface pulse --dry-run
task product-signal:submit -- --surface pulse --nps 9
Gap: comments on the standing pulse thread (enable+consent sufficient)deftai/directive remains hard-confirm via deft-directive-feedback / task feedback:filetask product-signal:consent -- --revoke
# and/or disable: set plan.policy.productSignal.enabled false
deft-directive-product-signal complete — exiting skill.