| name | fastly-kv-concurrent-write-retry |
| description | Fix intermittent 500 errors with "Failed to store" in Fastly KV Store during concurrent
writes. Use when: (1) Batch operations fail with ~10-20% error rate, (2) Error contains
"Failed to store list" or similar KV write failures, (3) Multiple requests updating the
same KV key simultaneously, (4) Read-modify-write pattern without locking. The fix is
adding a retry loop that re-reads before each write attempt.
|
| author | Claude Code |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| date | "2026-01-28T00:00:00.000Z" |
Fastly KV Store Concurrent Write Race Condition
Problem
When multiple concurrent requests perform read-modify-write operations on the same
Fastly KV Store key, writes can fail with intermittent 500 errors. This commonly
occurs during batch uploads where each request updates a shared list or counter.
Context / Trigger Conditions
- Error message contains "Failed to store list:" or similar KV write failure
- ~10-20% failure rate during concurrent operations
- Multiple requests from the same user/session updating shared state
- Pattern:
read key → modify data → write key without any locking
Example error:
{"error":"Failed to store list:"}
Solution
Add a retry loop that re-reads the data before each write attempt:
pub fn add_to_list(key: &str, item: &str) -> Result<()> {
for attempt in 0..5 {
let mut items = get_list(key)?;
if items.contains(&item.to_string()) {
return Ok(());
}
items.push(item.to_string());
match put_list(key, &items) {
Ok(()) => return Ok(()),
Err(e) if attempt < 4 => {
eprintln!("[KV] Retry {} for list update: {}", attempt + 1, e);
continue;
}
Err(e) => return Err(e),
}
}
Err(Error::new("Max retries exceeded for list update"))
}
Key points:
- Re-read on each retry - The fresh read picks up changes from concurrent writes
- Check for duplicates - Avoid adding the same item twice
- Log retries - Helps debug if issues persist
- Limit retries - 5 attempts is usually sufficient
Verification
- Batch operations that previously failed ~16% should now succeed ~100%
- Retry log messages (
[KV] Retry N for...) indicate the mechanism is working
- If still failing after 5 retries, there may be a deeper issue
Example
Before (race condition):
pub fn add_to_user_list(pubkey: &str, hash: &str) -> Result<()> {
let mut hashes = get_user_blobs(pubkey)?;
if !hashes.contains(&hash) {
hashes.push(hash.to_string());
put_user_list(pubkey, &hashes)?;
}
Ok(())
}
After (with retry):
pub fn add_to_user_list(pubkey: &str, hash: &str) -> Result<()> {
for attempt in 0..5 {
let mut hashes = get_user_blobs(pubkey)?;
if hashes.contains(&hash) {
return Ok(());
}
hashes.push(hash.to_string());
match put_user_list(pubkey, &hashes) {
Ok(()) => return Ok(()),
Err(e) if attempt < 4 => continue,
Err(e) => return Err(e),
}
}
Err(Error::new("Max retries exceeded"))
}
Notes
- Fastly Compute doesn't have
sleep(), so retries happen immediately
- The re-read is what provides the "delay" by picking up concurrent changes
- Consider using atomic operations if available (Fastly KV doesn't support CAS)
- For high-contention scenarios, consider sharding the key space
- This pattern also applies to remove operations (read-filter-write)
References