القائمة
Design and build a generational improvement when the current approach is wrong or plateaued. Audit, choose a coherent architecture, implement, test, and hand off.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Raise the ceiling, don't climb toward it. When a target is nearly hit or a metric has plateaued, question the target itself: name the binding constraint, separate the physics floor from the assumed floor, design the regime change that makes 10x reachable, commit through the valley. Triggers: 'breakout', '10x this', 'raise the ceiling', 'why are we capped', 'think way bigger', 'this metric is a cage'.
Prove that a merged change is actually live and production behavior is measured against the deployed artifact. Use after merge, before claiming deployed/live/validated, for Cloudflare Pages/Workers deploys, cache claims, perf claims, and release closeout.
Diagnose and improve eval harnesses built on @tangle-network/agent-eval or similar trace-first systems. Use when success/failure rates, scorecard deltas, judge outputs, promotion gates, benchmark rows, or improvement campaigns may be contaminated by harness bugs, evaluator drift, routing/auth failures, missing traces, or invalid baselines.
Goal-pursuit loop: measure, diagnose, experiment, verify, compare, and iterate against a measurable target. Triggers: evolve, optimize, make this better, push to target.
Split one messy experiment branch into N clean, independent branches — one logical change each, built from the merge-base, disjoint change-sets, each an isolated reviewable PR. Triggers: 'finalize', 'split this branch', 'atomize this', 'make reviewable PRs', 'decompose this mess'.
Read repo/session state and choose the single next skill: exploit (evolve/polish), explore (pursue/meta-harness/breakout), bootstrap (eval-agent), diagnose (diagnose/eval-harness-diagnose), or step back (reflect). One dispatch, then exit.
| name | pursue |
| description | Design and build a generational improvement when the current approach is wrong or plateaued. Audit, choose a coherent architecture, implement, test, and hand off. |
Use this for architectural leaps, not parameter tuning. The output is a working generation with tests, not a proposal.
.evolve/ progress, prior pursuits, and current failures./hypothesize when one exists), argue them against each other, pick the winner by predicted leverage, and graft the best ideas from the runners-up. Then commit to one coherent change set; avoid unrelated cleanup.Use references/full-reference.md for the full pursuit template and verification details.
hypothesize before designing, when the architecture field is wide open — get a researched, ranked set of candidate designs to run the tournament on.evolve to tune a working generation.breakout when the generation lands but the ceiling still feels small — the honest next move is a higher target, not a better point under this one.polish when the generation works but quality gaps remain.autopsy if the generation result is null or suspicious.