القائمة
List and explain the available preset writing personas for Persona Write.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Draft, rewrite, audit, and refine text through a specific writing persona using a multi-pass workflow. For long documents, process section by section instead of rewriting everything in one shot.
Reproduce another writer's style. Ingest one or more samples, extract a stylometric and rhetorical fingerprint, draft new text in that voice at matched quality, and verify the match against a research-backed rubric.
Review a text through a chosen reviewer persona. Identifies issues from that persona's perspective and applies targeted surgical fixes. Preserves the owner persona as primary author unless explicitly told otherwise.
Help the user describe and shape a custom writing persona in plain language so it can be used with Persona Write. Grounded in stylometry, rhetoric, and personality-linguistics research.
| name | persona-list |
| description | List and explain the available preset writing personas for Persona Write. |
Use this skill when the user wants to browse or understand the available writing personas.
List the available personas in plain English.
For each persona, explain:
Keep the descriptions practical, not abstract.
Direct, concise, technical, mechanism-first. Good for engineering explanations, technical writing, and critique. Pick this if you want writing that assumes reader competence and does not over-explain.
Practical, clear, useful, implementation-minded. Good for product, planning, and system design writing. Pick this if you want writing that focuses on what to do and why, not on theory.
Easy to follow, explanatory without fluff. Good for educational content or explanations for non-experts. Pick this if you want writing that earns understanding without condescending.
Careful, critical, evidence-aware. Good for research, critique, and writing that needs stronger judgment and reasoning. Pick this if you want writing that notices weak assumptions and does not overclaim.
Very direct, compressed, minimal ceremony. Good for tactical writing, tight rewrites, and cutting fluff hard. Pick this if you want writing stripped to the minimum needed to land the point.
Problem-first, design-aware. Leads with the reader's frustration before the product. Good for READMEs, landing pages, product docs, and any writing that needs to earn attention before asking for action. Treats visual hierarchy and whitespace as part of the message — a soulless layout kills interest before a word is read. Pick this if you want writing that makes the reader feel understood, then gives them a reason to care.
If the user seems unsure, help them choose by asking what they want the writing to feel like:
Do not overwhelm the user with theory. Help them choose.
