article-hardening-review

name	article-hardening-review
description	Coordinates peer, editorial, red-team, and devil's-advocate reviews for UOGTO article-hardening phases.

Article Hardening Review Skill

Use this skill when implementing or reviewing uogto_article_hardening_protocol_20260624.

Review Inputs

• Track plan: conductor/tracks/uogto_article_hardening_protocol_20260624/plan.md
• Agent registry: conductor/agents/article-hardening-review-agents.json
• Review workflow: conductor/workflows/article-hardening-phase-review.md
• Protocol artifacts: docs/article-hardening/

Required Review Roles

For each phase, assign:

1. ontology_peer_reviewer
2. methods_editor
3. evidence_red_team
4. devils_advocate_reviewer

For phases 2 through 8, also assign:

5. simulation_modelling_peer_reviewer

Review Procedure

1. Identify the phase and artifacts under review.
2. Read the acceptance criteria and the relevant generated artifacts.
3. Produce reviewer notes under docs/article-hardening/reviews/.
4. Record reviewer assignments and outcomes in docs/article-hardening/reviews/phase-review-log.jsonl.
5. Classify findings as fix_now, defer, reject, needs_user_input, or external_blocker.
6. Apply in-scope fixes before marking a phase complete.
7. Run make article-hardening-protocol, focused tests, and make validate.

Output Standard

Reviewer notes should be concise, evidence-backed, and explicit about whether a finding affects article wording, source eligibility, UOGTO inclusion, mapping confidence, reproducibility, or validation.