بنقرة واحدة
gsd-execute-phase
Execute all plans in a phase with wave-based parallelization
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Execute all plans in a phase with wave-based parallelization
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Generate tests for a completed phase based on UAT criteria and implementation
Generate an AI-SPEC.md design contract for phases that involve building AI systems.
Autonomous audit-to-fix pipeline — find issues, classify, fix, test, commit
Audit milestone completion against original intent before archiving
Cross-phase audit of all outstanding UAT and verification items
Run all remaining phases autonomously — discuss→plan→execute per phase
| name | gsd-execute-phase |
| description | Execute all plans in a phase with wave-based parallelization |
| metadata | {"short-description":"Execute all plans in a phase with wave-based parallelization"} |
<codex_skill_adapter>
$gsd-execute-phase.$gsd-execute-phase as {{GSD_ARGS}}.{{GSD_ARGS}} as empty.GSD workflows use AskUserQuestion (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex request_user_input:
Parameter mapping:
header → headerquestion → question"Label" — description → {label: "Label", description: "description"}id from header: lowercase, replace spaces with underscoresBatched calls:
AskUserQuestion([q1, q2]) → single request_user_input with multiple entries in questions[]Multi-select workaround:
multiSelect. Use sequential single-selects, or present a numbered freeform list asking the user to enter comma-separated numbers.Execute mode fallback:
request_user_input is rejected or unavailable, you MUST stop and present the questions as a plain-text numbered list, then wait for the user's reply. Do NOT pick a default and continue (#3018).--auto or --all),
(b) the user has explicitly approved a specific default for this question, or
(c) the workflow's documented contract says defaults are safe (e.g. autonomous lifecycle paths).GSD workflows use Task(...) (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex collaboration tools:
Direct mapping:
Task(subagent_type="X", prompt="Y") → spawn_agent(agent_type="X", message="Y")Task(model="...") → omit. spawn_agent has no inline model parameter;
GSD embeds the resolved per-agent model directly into each agent's .toml
at install time so model_overrides from .planning/config.json and
~/.gsd/defaults.json are honored automatically by Codex's agent router.fork_context: false by default — GSD agents load their own context via <files_to_read> blocksTask(isolation="worktree") / Agent(isolation="worktree") → no direct Codex mapping.
Codex spawn_agent does not create or bind a git worktree automatically.
Workflows that require this isolation must fail closed or use an explicit
manual worktree protocol before spawning (#3360).Spawn restriction:
spawn_agent to cases where the user has explicitly
requested sub-agents. When automatic spawning is not permitted, do the
work inline in the current agent rather than attempting to force a spawn.Parallel fan-out:
wait(ids) for all to completeResult parsing:
CHECKPOINT, PLAN COMPLETE, SUMMARY, etc.close_agent(id) after collecting results from each agent
</codex_skill_adapter>Orchestrator stays lean: discover plans, analyze dependencies, group into waves, spawn subagents, collect results. Each subagent loads the full execute-plan context and handles its own plan.
Optional wave filter:
--wave N executes only Wave N for pacing, quota management, or staged rolloutFlag handling rule:
{{GSD_ARGS}}{{GSD_ARGS}}, treat it as inactiveContext budget: ~15% orchestrator, 100% fresh per subagent.
<execution_context> @/Users/lmarques/Dev/efx-mux/.codex/get-shit-done/workflows/execute-phase.md @/Users/lmarques/Dev/efx-mux/.codex/get-shit-done/references/ui-brand.md </execution_context>
<runtime_note>
Copilot (VS Code): Use vscode_askquestions wherever this workflow calls AskUserQuestion. They are equivalent — vscode_askquestions is the VS Code Copilot implementation of the same interactive question API.
</runtime_note>
Available optional flags (documentation only — not automatically active):
--wave N — Execute only Wave N in the phase. Use when you want to pace execution or stay inside usage limits.--gaps-only — Execute only gap closure plans (plans with gap_closure: true in frontmatter). Use after verify-work creates fix plans.--interactive — Execute plans sequentially inline (no subagents) with user checkpoints between tasks. Lower token usage, pair-programming style. Best for small phases, bug fixes, and verification gaps.Active flags must be derived from {{GSD_ARGS}}:
--wave N is active only if the literal --wave token is present in {{GSD_ARGS}}--gaps-only is active only if the literal --gaps-only token is present in {{GSD_ARGS}}--interactive is active only if the literal --interactive token is present in {{GSD_ARGS}}Context files are resolved inside the workflow via gsd-sdk query init.execute-phase and per-subagent <files_to_read> blocks.