القائمة
Turn the current conversation into a spec and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Validate and triage pull-request review findings before addressing selected items.
Review changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes - Standards (does the code follow this repository's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue or PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel subagents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
Create git commits using Conventional Commits. Use when the user asks to commit code, prepare a commit, write a commit message, or standardize commit history with conventional commit types, scopes, breaking-change markers, and safe git workflow checks.
Publish the current branch as a review-ready pull or merge request.
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when the user wants to pin down domain terminology or a ubiquitous language, record an architectural decision, or when another skill needs to maintain the domain model.
| name | to-spec |
| description | Turn the current conversation into a spec and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
This skill takes the current conversation context and codebase understanding and produces a spec (you may know this document as a PRD). Do NOT interview the user — just synthesize what you already know.
The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you — run setup-skills if not.
Explore the repo to understand the current state of the codebase, if you haven't already. Use the project's domain glossary vocabulary throughout the spec, and respect any ADRs in the area you're touching.
Sketch out the seams at which you're going to test the feature. Existing seams should be preferred to new ones. Use the highest seam possible. If new seams are needed, propose them at the highest point you can. The fewer seams across the codebase, the better - the ideal number is one.
Check with the user that these seams match their expectations.
ready-for-agent triage label - no need for additional triage.The problem that the user is facing, from the user's perspective.
The solution to the problem, from the user's perspective.
A focused, numbered list of user stories. Each story should describe a distinct actor, capability, and benefit rather than repeating minor variations. Use this format:
Cover the important user-visible behaviors without duplicating requirements that are better expressed as acceptance criteria.
A numbered list of observable, testable conditions that must be true for the spec to be complete. Cover relevant success paths, failure paths, permissions, boundaries, and edge cases. Trace each criterion to a user story when practical.
A list of implementation decisions that were made. This can include:
Do NOT include specific file paths or code snippets. They may end up being outdated very quickly.
Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it within the relevant decision and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts — not a working demo, just the important bits.
A list of testing decisions that were made. Include:
A description of the things that are out of scope for this spec.
Any further notes about the feature.