review-r
Review existing R analysis code for quality and reproducibility.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Review existing R analysis code for quality and reproducibility.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
End-to-end empirical data analysis workflow for R or Python projects.
Find and assess datasets for a research question.
Repository-wide consistency audit for skills, hooks, rules, and docs.
Systematic literature review workflow using parallel librarian agents.
Structured interview and project-spec workflow for new research ideas.
Proofreading workflow for academic manuscripts and papers.
| name | review-r |
| description | Review existing R analysis code for quality and reproducibility. |
Run the comprehensive R code review protocol.
Identify scripts to review:
$ARGUMENTS is a specific .R filename: review that file only$ARGUMENTS is a name pattern (e.g., model_name): glob for matching .R files. If multiple matches, ask the user to choose conversationally. Do not use request_user_input here because the selection may be multi-file and Codex question UI is single-choice only.$ARGUMENTS is all: review all R scripts in scripts/R/ and Figures/*/$ARGUMENTS is empty, glob for all .R files. If multiple are found, ask the user to choose conversationally as above.For each script, read agents/r-reviewer.md and apply that review protocol.
rules/r-code-conventions.md for current standardsquality_reports/ if it is missing before savingquality_reports/[script_name]_r_review.mdr-reviewer as a separate subagent and merge the resultAfter all reviews complete, present a summary:
IMPORTANT: Do NOT edit any R source files. Only produce reports. Fixes are applied after user review.