arxiv-space-paper-to-brief

name	arxiv-space-paper-to-brief
description	Turn an astrophysics/space-science arXiv paper into a structured brief tuned for space audiences — adds object/mission context, instruments, and observational caveats. Use when summarizing an astro-ph paper, a space-science result, or a mission's published findings.
version	0.1.0
domain	cosmos
tags	["arxiv","astrophysics","space","brief","astro-ph"]

arXiv Space Paper → Brief

An astro-ph paper → a structured brief with the context space readers need.

Purpose

The space-tuned sibling of ../../research/arxiv-paper-to-brief. Same rigor, plus the context astrophysics readers expect: which objects/missions, which instruments, and the observational caveats (selection effects, calibration, model assumptions) that determine how much to trust a result.

When it fires

• Keyword triggers: astro-ph, astrophysics paper, space paper, observation paper, mission result
• File triggers: papers/astro/**, *.pdf
• Command triggers: /arxiv-space-paper-to-brief

Inputs

Input	Required	Notes
paper	yes	arXiv URL/ID, PDF, or text.
audience	no	astronomer (default), enthusiast, general.

Workflow

1. Metadata + identifier — title, authors, date, arXiv ID. ✅ Check: ID captured.
2. Object/mission context — what was observed and with which facility/instrument.
3. Problem + method — faithful to the paper.
4. Results — each tied to a figure/table; claimed vs. demonstrated separated.
5. Observational caveats — selection effects, calibration, sample size, model dependence. Be candid — this is where space results are over-read.
6. Why it matters — for the chosen audience.
7. Citations — exact quotes/figures with locations.

Output contract

{
  "metadata": { "title": "string", "authors": "string", "id": "string", "date": "string" },
  "context": { "objects": ["string"], "instruments": ["string"] },
  "problem": "string",
  "method": "string",
  "results": [{ "claim": "string", "evidence": "string" }],
  "caveats": ["string — observational/statistical"],
  "why_it_matters": "string",
  "citations": ["string"]
}

Tools & MCP

• Tools: WebFetch, Read. MCP: optional docs/library MCP.

Quality bar

• Instruments/objects named correctly.
• Observational caveats are substantive, not generic.
• Results tied to figures/tables; identifier correct.

Example

Input: an astro-ph exoplanet-atmosphere paper → brief with the telescope/instrument, the detection claim tied to a figure, and caveats on signal-to-noise and model assumptions.

---

Built on SIP — Starlight Intelligence Protocol Substrate: starlightintelligence.org/protocol v1.1.0 Layers used: [file-contract, attestation, sovereignty] Vertical: starlight-agent-skills · portable capability layer