بنقرة واحدة
parallel-agents-orchestration
Dispatch concurrent agent workflows for independent problems
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Dispatch concurrent agent workflows for independent problems
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Apply official FrankX brand standards to all artifacts, ensuring visual consistency across content, products, and communications. Use this skill for any FrankX-related content creation, design work, or communication.
Frank's personalized career and professional mastery coaching
Guided process to create your personalized Soulbook - a comprehensive life transformation system
Creates expert positioning content, social media posts, and marketing materials for Frank's personal brand and AI coaching business with soul-aligned messaging
Master-level visionary book writing system with research-driven methodology, author voice modeling, and iterative refinement across 9 quality dimensions
Expert Suno AI prompt engineering for cinematic, transformative music creation. Use this skill when creating Suno prompts for Vibe OS sessions, meditation tracks, or any AI-generated music that needs professional quality and emotional resonance.
| name | Parallel Agents Orchestration |
| description | Dispatch concurrent agent workflows for independent problems |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| source | Adapted from obra/superpowers with FrankX orchestration patterns |
Use this pattern when you have multiple independent problems that:
Good candidates:
NOT good candidates:
Problem: 6 failing tests across 3 domains
Analysis:
├── Authentication (auth.test.ts)
│ ├── Login failure
│ └── Session expiry
├── Products API (products.test.ts)
│ ├── List filtering
│ └── Price calculation
└── UI Components (components.test.ts)
├── Modal rendering
└── Form validation
These are INDEPENDENT - parallel dispatch appropriate.
Each agent gets:
// Agent 1: Authentication
const authTask = {
domain: "Authentication",
files: ["src/auth/", "tests/auth.test.ts"],
failures: ["Login failure", "Session expiry"],
constraints: "Don't modify product or UI code",
deliverable: "Fixed tests with explanation"
};
// Agent 2: Products API
const productsTask = {
domain: "Products API",
files: ["src/api/products/", "tests/products.test.ts"],
failures: ["List filtering", "Price calculation"],
constraints: "Don't modify auth or UI code",
deliverable: "Fixed tests with explanation"
};
// Agent 3: UI Components
const uiTask = {
domain: "UI Components",
files: ["src/components/", "tests/components.test.ts"],
failures: ["Modal rendering", "Form validation"],
constraints: "Don't modify auth or API code",
deliverable: "Fixed tests with explanation"
};
Using Claude Code's Task tool:
// In Claude Code, dispatch multiple agents in ONE message
// This runs them concurrently
<Task: "Fix auth tests" agent="code-fixer">
Investigate and fix authentication test failures in tests/auth.test.ts.
Focus ONLY on auth domain. Do not modify product or UI code.
Return: Summary of root cause and fix applied.
</Task>
<Task: "Fix products tests" agent="code-fixer">
Investigate and fix products API test failures in tests/products.test.ts.
Focus ONLY on products domain. Do not modify auth or UI code.
Return: Summary of root cause and fix applied.
</Task>
<Task: "Fix UI tests" agent="code-fixer">
Investigate and fix UI component test failures in tests/components.test.ts.
Focus ONLY on UI domain. Do not modify auth or API code.
Return: Summary of root cause and fix applied.
</Task>
After all agents complete:
Task: Publish new blog post
Parallel Agents:
├── SEO Agent
│ ├── Keyword optimization
│ ├── Meta description
│ └── Schema markup
├── Social Agent
│ ├── Twitter thread
│ ├── LinkedIn post
│ └── Instagram caption
└── Email Agent
├── Newsletter segment
└── Welcome sequence update
Synthesis: Coordinate publish timing
Task: Research AI agent frameworks
Parallel Agents:
├── LangGraph Research
│ └── Patterns, examples, best practices
├── Claude SDK Research
│ └── Patterns, examples, best practices
├── OpenAI AgentKit Research
│ └── Patterns, examples, best practices
└── Oracle ADK Research
└── Patterns, examples, best practices
Synthesis: Comparison matrix, recommendations
Task: Comprehensive code review
Parallel Agents:
├── Security Analyst
│ └── Vulnerabilities, OWASP
├── Performance Analyst
│ └── Bottlenecks, optimizations
├── Accessibility Analyst
│ └── WCAG compliance
└── Code Quality Analyst
└── Patterns, DRY, complexity
Synthesis: Prioritized action items
## Task: [Specific Domain Problem]
### Context
[All information the agent needs]
### Scope
- Files to examine: [list]
- Files to modify: [list]
- Domain boundaries: [what's in/out]
### Constraints
- DO NOT modify: [list of off-limits areas]
- DO NOT introduce: [breaking changes, new dependencies, etc.]
- MUST follow: [coding standards, patterns]
### Expected Output
1. Root cause analysis (2-3 sentences)
2. Fix applied (file paths and summary)
3. Verification steps taken
4. Any concerns or recommendations
### Success Criteria
- [Specific test passes]
- [No regressions]
- [Clean implementation]
| Bad Practice | Why It Fails |
|---|---|
| Vague scope | Agent changes wrong files |
| Missing context | Agent asks questions or guesses |
| No constraints | Agents conflict with each other |
| Coupled tasks | Agents duplicate work or conflict |
| No synthesis | Fixes don't integrate properly |
Input: 6 test failures across 3 files
Sequential approach: ~45 minutes
- Investigate each failure one by one
- Context switching between domains
- Waiting for each fix before next
Parallel approach: ~15 minutes
- 3 agents work simultaneously
- Each focuses on one domain
- Synthesis adds 5 minutes
- 3x faster overall
Result: 6 failures fixed, 0 conflicts, 3x speedup
implementation-planning - Plan parallel executionsystematic-debugging - Each agent uses thistest-driven-development - Verify fixes with tests