بنقرة واحدة
interview-to-freeform-summary
Normalize a free-form user interview into the shared freeform-summary workflow handoff.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Normalize a free-form user interview into the shared freeform-summary workflow handoff.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Carry an existing Galaxy workflow's tests forward as a regression baseline and augment them for a change-set's deltas, emitting a Galaxy test plan.
Triage failing Galaxy run outputs; classify the failure surface and capture evidence before recommending repairs.
Synthesize a Galaxy workflow test plan from a free-form summary and the Galaxy design briefs.
Assemble Galaxy workflow test fixtures and assertions.
Execute a workflow's tests via Planemo; emit structured pass/fail and outputs.
Convert one nf-core module dir into a Galaxy tool wrapper (tool.xml + macros.xml + _provenance.yml + remote-URL <test> blocks).
| name | interview-to-freeform-summary |
| description | Normalize a free-form user interview into the shared freeform-summary workflow handoff. |
Follow the procedure below and use the artifact/reference sections as the runtime contract.
freeform-summary as freeform-summary.md. Format: markdown. Methods, tools, sample data, references, constraints, open questions, and workflow intent gathered from a user interview.Turn a free-form user interview into the shared freeform-summary artifact consumed by downstream freeform-summary skills.
The harness owns the live interaction style. It may run this skill inside an interactive Claude/Codex session, feed it a saved transcript, or collect answers through a custom UI. The skill's job is the normalized handoff, not the conversation.
Emit Markdown, not a target workflow schema. Downstream skills treat this exactly like the output of summarize-paper: useful source evidence with explicit uncertainty, not a fully specified workflow. Keeping the two producers shape-compatible is what lets paper and interview starts share one design/template tier.
Record what the interview actually supports, and mark the rest as uncertain rather than inventing it:
A free-form source carries genuine uncertainty; preserve it. Do not promote a vague answer ("some kind of alignment") into a precise tool or parameter — record it as intent plus an open question. Silent invention here propagates as false confidence through every downstream brief.