القائمة
Converges to a recommended approach — the options, their tradeoffs against stated criteria, a pick, and the rationale (plus what would change the call). Use to decide among approaches, or /propose. Not for generating options (brainstorm) or deep-diving one (ideate).
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Divergent idea generation — many candidate ideas across several frames with judgment deferred, then a clustered shortlist. Use to open a solution space wide, or /brainstorm. Not for developing one idea (ideate) or picking one (propose).
Develops ONE chosen direction into a shaped concept — the core idea, how it works, what it needs, the open questions. Use to deepen a single idea, or /ideate. Not for generating many (brainstorm) or deciding among them (propose).
Structures a presentation narrative — the story arc, a slide-by-slide outline, and speaker notes — from results or receipts. Use to shape a talk or deck, or /present. Not for prose reports (report) or rendering visuals (asset).
Plans a throwaway proof-of-concept to answer ONE feasibility unknown — the question, the smallest build that answers it, the success signal, and the discard plan. Use to de-risk before committing, or /prototype. Not for the real build (executor) or deciding (propose).
Produces a REDTEAM-FINDINGS.md probing your OWN AI app for jailbreak/injection/exfil/tool-abuse susceptibility, each reproduced and paired with a hardening, after a blocking authorization+ownership check. Use to red-team an owned AI system defensively.
Produces a PENTEST-PLAN.md then PENTEST-FINDINGS.md for your OWN app's attack surface (each finding reproduced, non-destructive, with remediation) after a blocking authorization+ownership check. Use to test an owned app's attack surface defensively.
| name | propose |
| description | Converges to a recommended approach — the options, their tradeoffs against stated criteria, a pick, and the rationale (plus what would change the call). Use to decide among approaches, or /propose. Not for generating options (brainstorm) or deep-diving one (ideate). |
The convergence skill. Given a set of options (from brainstorm/ideate, or stated), it weighs them against
explicit criteria, recommends one, and says why — including what evidence would change the call. It
closes a decision; it does not open the space (that is brainstorm) or develop a single concept in depth
(that is ideate).
It is read-only and advisory: it writes a PROPOSAL.md, never product code. The output is judged by
Review — are the criteria explicit and applied evenly, is the recommendation actually supported by the
tradeoffs, and is the "what would change my mind" honest?
Does: state the decision + the options in play; make the decision criteria explicit (weighted if it matters);
compare each option against them evenly; recommend one with the rationale; name the runner-up and the
condition under which it wins; state what evidence would flip the call; write PROPOSAL.md + a receipt.
Does not: generate the options (that is brainstorm), develop one option in depth (that is ideate), build
a proof-of-concept (that is prototype), or write product code.
brainstorm to generate them.ideate.prototype to get the evidence first, then
propose.specify.brainstorm/ideate, or given).PROPOSAL.md — decision + options + criteria + comparison + recommendation + flip condition.proposals/PROPOSAL.md if that dir exists) — persistence:
Ephemeral. Decision · options · explicit criteria (weighted) · even comparison · recommendation +
rationale · runner-up + flip condition · what would change the call.<workspace>/receipts/propose-receipt-<ts>.json): base schema + decision, options,
criteria, recommendation, runner_up, flip_condition, proposal_path. persistence: Ephemeral.Done when: PROPOSAL.md states the decision, lists the options, applies explicit criteria evenly,
recommends one with supported rationale, names the runner-up + flip condition, and states what would change
the call; a receipt records the decision + recommendation.
Not done if: criteria were written after the pick to justify it (post-hoc); options were compared unevenly (a favourite got a lighter lens); or a clear recommendation was forced where the comparison did not support one.
Next step: prototype gets evidence for an unresolved feasibility factor; specify turns the chosen
approach into a task card.
propose decides among (breadth / depth). propose
converges; they open.PROPOSAL.md when the call is
high-impact and low-confidence.