| name | content-hub-site |
| description | Type-specific generation contract for research, standards, information-platform, resource-library, and institutional content-hub websites. |
| triggers | ["research center","information platform","resource hub","standards system","downloads","institutional"] |
Content Hub Site
Use this skill when the site is a collection-first institutional or resource hub surface: research centers, standards systems, information platforms, policy/resource libraries, or downloads hubs.
Surface contract
- Treat the site as a content collection surface, not as a product catalog and not as a publishable editorial archive unless the request explicitly asks for blog/news/article behavior.
- Homepage and interior routes should establish collection purpose, resource groupings, and onward navigation.
- Collection routes must remain route-owned. Do not flatten them into one repeated split hero or one generic route shell.
Visual identity contract
- Content hubs must not share the same visual system as corporate B2B sites or docs/knowledge sites.
- Prefer an editorial/institutional archive, standards library, or research-desk aesthetic with publication-like typography and a paper/ink/terracotta/olive or similarly distinct archive palette.
- Do not default to a generic green-white rounded-card dashboard theme when the surface is a content hub.
- Preferred CSS token family: warm paper background, ink/brown text,
terracotta primary, archival gold or olive accent, and a serif-forward type
pairing.
- The dominant composition should use collection shelves, ledger rows, archive grids, research cards, resource indexes, and dense onward navigation.
- Avoid enterprise sales modules and documentation workspace chrome as the dominant content-hub template.
Route family contract
/ usually uses an editorial/institutional collection-index homepage
archetype, not the generic marketing homepage rhythm and not docs workspace
chrome.
- Exception: when the confirmed prompt explicitly says route
/ is the
official homepage, institutional overview, or umbrella brand entry, keep the
first screen institution-led. In that case the masthead must establish brand
mission, trust scope, and audience first, and the collection/index mechanics
move to later shelves or proof rows instead of defining the homepage title,
H1, or lead identity.
- Preferred homepage sequence:
- editorial archive masthead
- topic or collection shelves
- standards or research ledger
- resource index rows
- institutional CTA
- Preferred institution-led homepage sequence for that exception:
- brand-led institutional masthead
- capability or scope shelves
- standards/research proof band
- consultation or route CTA
- For the institution-led exception, the homepage title, meta description, H1, first lead paragraph, and first capability/proof band must stay at the umbrella-institution level. Do not let certification, downloads, information-entry, consultation-entry, support-entry, or route-family naming dominate the opening identity.
- For the institution-led exception, do not present route
/ as a contact/support intake page with a thin overview. The opening needs enough institutional depth to stand on its own before visitors reach route cards or consultation actions.
- Homepage modules should use route-owned collection classes such as
collection-home, archive-masthead, resource-shelf,
standards-ledger, research-index, issue-map, and
institutional-context.
- For the institution-led exception, the opening section should instead use
route-owned institutional classes such as
institutional-masthead,
brand-overview, capability-shelf, standards-scope, or
institutional-proof.
- Do not lead the content-hub homepage with only generic
hero, hero-grid,
card-grid, page-section, or campaign CTA shells.
- Do not hide generic marketing hero utility geometry behind collection-owned
class names. A content-hub homepage opening must not be built from
hero,
hero-wrap, hero-grid, hero__grid, hero-copy, hero__copy,
hero__body, hero-panel, hero__panel, hero-aside, an aside, panel,
or right-side visual rail. The masthead, shelves, ledgers, and resource rows
should create the opening geometry.
- Research, standards, information-platform, downloads, and advocacy/certification support routes should each open with their own route-owned lead band.
- Collection openings should use route-owned collection semantics rather than generic
hero / hero-grid / aside shells.
- Resource cards, summary ledgers, index rows, and cross-navigation are the primary building blocks.
- Do not invent
/blog/{slug}/ detail pages, editorial archives, or publishability promises unless the request explicitly demands them.
- Do not let the homepage title, meta description, H1, or first lead paragraph
read like a downloads hub, certification portal, search directory, or
resource index when the prompt requires an official homepage identity.
Shared shell contract
- Header, nav, and footer must preserve the planned route set across every route.
- Footer should keep all planned destinations, especially collection-first routes such as research, information, standards, downloads, and cases.
- Shared shell copy must stay visitor-facing and institution-facing.
- Do not expose workflow/process/meta text, route-planning rationale, or internal direction labels.
Copy and media contract
- Copy should explain why the collection exists, how to use it, and where each resource path leads.
- Media should reinforce institutional/research/resource context when available, but should not dominate the experience like a campaign hero.
- Do not drift into product-sales grammar, founder-story framing, or fake long-form editorial filler.
- Do not leak placeholder, assumption, or content-gap wording.
- Do not expose internal layout, responsive-review, or QA labels such as
Responsive layout, Shared shell, Desktop and mobile review,
homepage groups, homepage frames, or visual system keeps.
- Do not use page-mechanics self-description on interior routes, such as
The page groups..., This route helps teams...,
This page helps teams compare..., or
How the collection is organized.
- Rewrite any homepage or section explanation around the hub subject itself:
standards coverage, research scope, resource categories, evidence quality,
downloads, or institutional outcomes.