draft-review

name	draft-review
description	Create and maintain a draft review queue with founder sign-off checklist — categorize drafts by readiness, flag issues, track approvals, and minimize review friction.
version	2.0.0
author	Crewm8
maintainer	Gokul (github.com/gokulb20)
license	MIT
homepage	https://crewm8.ai
tags	["social","publishing","review","approval","workflow","founder"]
related_skills	["schedule-queue","brand-voice-system","content-calendar"]
inputs_required	["content-drafts-for-review-window","review-cadence","founder-availability"]
deliverables	["draft-review-queue-with-status-tracking"]
compatible_agents	["hermes","claude-code","droid","cursor","windsurf","openai","openclaw","generic"]
execution_tier	2
required_tools	[]
required_env_vars	[]

Draft Review

Manage a review queue that gets content from "written" to "approved" to "scheduled" with clear sign-off gates. The founder's time is the scarcest resource — this skill minimizes review friction while maintaining quality control.

Purpose

Founders are the bottleneck. If they need to review 30 drafts at once, they'll skim 5 and ignore the rest. This skill batches, prioritizes, and pre-clears drafts so the founder only sees what needs their judgment — and the rest flows through automatically.

When to Use

• Content batch is drafted and ready for review
• Setting up recurring review cadence
• Founder says "review everything before it goes out"
• Review is becoming a bottleneck
• Tracking approval patterns over time

Inputs Required

• Drafts for the review window (posts, threads, captions, visual briefs)
• Brand voice guide (for pre-review checks)
• Any flagged uncertainties from the content creator

Quick Reference

Draft Status	Meaning	Action
Draft	Written, unreviewed	Send to review queue
Needs Revision	Founder flagged issues	Revise and re-submit
Conditionally Approved	Approved with minor changes	Apply changes; no re-review
Approved	Ready to schedule	Move to schedule-queue
Rejected	Concept doesn't work	Archive with reason

Procedure

1. Collect all drafts for the review window. Organize by platform and scheduled date.

2. Pre-review each draft before sending to founder:

   • Brand voice check (from brand-voice-system)
   • Character counts and platform formatting verified
   • Factual claims sourced
   • URLs verified working
   • Uncertainties flagged

3. Build the review package:

   • Group by urgency: "must review today / this week / when you have time"
   • Include context: why this post, what pillar, expected posting day/time
   • Limit each batch to 10-15 items

4. Send for review with clear decision options:

   • Thumbs up = approved as-is
   • "Changes:" = conditionally approved (apply changes, no re-review)
   • "Let's rework:" = needs revision (clarify what)
   • "Skip:" = reject (add reason)

5. Track review status:

   • Draft name → status → reviewer notes → date
   • Flag drafts "needs revision" for 48+ hours
   • Escalate if founder hasn't reviewed by scheduling deadline

6. Optimize over time:

   • If 90%+ approved as-is, propose skipping review for certain content types
   • If founder consistently rejects certain formats/pillars, stop drafting them
   • Target: review-to-scheduled under 24 hours for standard content

Output Format

# Draft Review Queue: [Week of Date]

## Review Batch [N]
**Deadline:** [Date/time]

### Item 1: [Post Title]
**Platform:** [X / LinkedIn / IG / TikTok]
**Pillar:** [Pillar]
**Scheduled for:** [Day, time]
**Preview:** [Full text]

**Decision:**
- [ ] Approved
- [ ] Approved with changes: [notes]
- [ ] Needs revision: [what]
- [ ] Rejected: [reason]

### Item 2...
...

## Review Summary
- **Total in queue:** [N]
- **Urgent (by EOD):** [N]
- **Approval rate (trailing 4 weeks):** [N]%
- **Top rejection reasons:** [Pattern 1], [Pattern 2]

Done Criteria

The skill is complete when:

1. All drafts are pre-reviewed (voice check + formatting + links)
2. Review package is organized by urgency
3. Decision options are clearly specified per draft
4. Review status is tracked
5. Approval patterns are documented (for process improvement)

Pitfalls

• Sending founder 30 drafts at once (they skim 5, ignore the rest)
• No pre-review before founder sees it (erodes trust)
• No clear deadline ("whenever" = never)
• Founder is bottleneck and posting stops (propose "trust me" tier)
• Rejections without reasons (you keep making the same mistake)

Verification

Check turnaround: draft submitted → founder approved. Target: under 24 hours. Check approval rate: if consistently high (90%+), reduce review friction. Check rejection patterns: if a format/pillar is rejected >30%, stop drafting it.