| name | openspec-review |
| description | Code and specification review for OpenSpec workflow. Triggers automatically after /opsx:apply task completion, after /opsx:feedback task completion, and before /opsx:archive. Use when user requests code review, spec compliance check, or when explicitly invoked via /openspec-review. |
| compatibility | Requires OpenSpec CLI, GoFrame v2 skill, openspec-e2e skill. |
OpenSpec Review
Structured code and specification review for the OpenSpec development workflow.
Spec Source: CLAUDE.md is the single source of truth for all review criteria.
When This Skill Activates
Automatic triggers:
- After completing each task in
/opsx:apply
- After completing each task in
/opspec-feedback
- Before executing
/opsx:archive
Manual trigger:
- User explicitly requests: "review this code", "check spec compliance", "/openspec-review"
Review Workflow
1. Identify Scope
Determine what needs to be reviewed:
- After task completion — Review files modified/created by the completed task
- Before archive — Review all changes in the current OpenSpec change
- Manual invocation — Ask user to specify scope or use current change
Run openspec status --change "<name>" --json to understand the current change state.
2. Load Specifications
Read CLAUDE.md to load all specifications. This is the single source of truth.
3. Backend Code Review
Trigger: Changes to files under apps/lina-core directory
- Invoke
goframe-v2 skill for GoFrame framework conventions
- Check against
CLAUDE.md backend code specifications
4. RESTful API Review
Trigger: Any API endpoint changes
Check against CLAUDE.md API design specifications.
5. Project Specification Review
Trigger: Any implementation changes
Check against CLAUDE.md architecture design specifications and code development specifications.
6. E2E Test Review
Trigger: New or modified E2E test files in hack/tests/e2e/ directory
- Invoke
openspec-e2e skill for test conventions
- Check against
CLAUDE.md E2E test specifications
7. Generate Review Report
## OpenSpec Review Report
**Change:** <change-name>
**Scope:** <task-specific / full change>
**Files Reviewed:** <count>
### Backend Code Review
✓ All checks passed / ⚠ N issues found
### RESTful API Review
✓ All endpoints compliant / ⚠ N violations found
### Project Spec Review
✓ Compliant with CLAUDE.md / ⚠ N violations found
### E2E Test Review
✓ Tests follow conventions / ⚠ N issues found
### Summary
- **Critical:** N (must fix before archive)
- **Warnings:** N (recommended to fix)
### Recommended Actions
1. [Specific action with CLAUDE.md reference]
Issue Severity
| Level | Behavior |
|---|
| Critical | Block archive, must fix |
| Warning | Show but allow proceed |
Integration Points
| Workflow Step | Behavior |
|---|
/opsx:apply task done | Review, offer to fix issues before next task |
/opspec-feedback task done | Review, fix before marking complete |
/opsx:archive | Review all changes, block on critical issues |
Guardrails
- CLAUDE.md is the single source of truth — All spec references point to it
- Only check categories relevant to changed files
- Don't block on warnings — only critical issues block archive
- Include file paths and line numbers in issue reports
- Offer to fix issues automatically when straightforward
