| name | research-lookup |
| description | Look up current research information using Perplexity's Sonar Pro Search or Sonar Reasoning Pro models through OpenRouter. Automatically selects the best model based on query complexity. Search academic papers, recent studies, technical documentation, and general research information with citations. |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Write","Edit","Bash"] |
Research Information Lookup
Overview
This skill enables real-time research information lookup using Perplexity's Sonar models through OpenRouter. It intelligently selects between Sonar Pro Search (fast, efficient lookup) and Sonar Reasoning Pro (deep analytical reasoning) based on query complexity. The skill provides access to current academic literature, recent studies, technical documentation, and general research information with proper citations and source attribution.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when you need:
- Current Research Information: Latest studies, papers, and findings in a specific field
- Literature Verification: Check facts, statistics, or claims against current research
- Background Research: Gather context and supporting evidence for scientific writing
- Citation Sources: Find relevant papers and studies to cite in manuscripts
- Technical Documentation: Look up specifications, protocols, or methodologies
- Recent Developments: Stay current with emerging trends and breakthroughs
- Statistical Data: Find recent statistics, survey results, or research findings
- Expert Opinions: Access insights from recent interviews, reviews, or commentary
Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics
When creating documents with this skill, always consider adding scientific diagrams and schematics to enhance visual communication.
If your document does not already contain schematics or diagrams:
- Use the scientific-schematics skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams
- Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language
- Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic
For new documents: Scientific schematics should be generated by default to visually represent key concepts, workflows, architectures, or relationships described in the text.
How to generate schematics:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png
The AI will automatically:
- Create publication-quality images with proper formatting
- Review and refine through multiple iterations
- Ensure accessibility (colorblind-friendly, high contrast)
- Save outputs in the figures/ directory
When to add schematics:
- Research information flow diagrams
- Query processing workflow illustrations
- Model selection decision trees
- System integration architecture diagrams
- Information retrieval pipeline visualizations
- Knowledge synthesis frameworks
- Any complex concept that benefits from visualization
For detailed guidance on creating schematics, refer to the scientific-schematics skill documentation.
Core Capabilities
1. Academic Research Queries
Search Academic Literature: Query for recent papers, studies, and reviews in specific domains:
Query Examples:
- "Recent advances in CRISPR gene editing 2024"
- "Latest clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease treatment"
- "Machine learning applications in drug discovery systematic review"
- "Climate change impacts on biodiversity meta-analysis"
Expected Response Format:
- Summary of key findings from recent literature
- Citation of 3-5 most relevant papers with authors, titles, journals, and years
- Key statistics or findings highlighted
- Identification of research gaps or controversies
- Links to full papers when available
2. Technical and Methodological Information
Protocol and Method Lookups: Find detailed procedures, specifications, and methodologies:
Query Examples:
- "Western blot protocol for protein detection"
- "RNA sequencing library preparation methods"
- "Statistical power analysis for clinical trials"
- "Machine learning model evaluation metrics"
Expected Response Format:
- Step-by-step procedures or protocols
- Required materials and equipment
- Critical parameters and considerations
- Troubleshooting common issues
- References to standard protocols or seminal papers
3. Statistical and Data Information
Research Statistics: Look up current statistics, survey results, and research data:
Query Examples:
- "Prevalence of diabetes in US population 2024"
- "Global renewable energy adoption statistics"
- "COVID-19 vaccination rates by country"
- "AI adoption in healthcare industry survey"
Expected Response Format:
- Current statistics with dates and sources
- Methodology of data collection
- Confidence intervals or margins of error when available
- Comparison with previous years or benchmarks
- Citations to original surveys or studies
4. Citation and Reference Assistance
Citation Finding: Locate the most influential, highly-cited papers from reputable authors and prestigious venues:
Query Examples:
- "Foundational papers on transformer architecture" (expect: Vaswani et al. 2017 in NeurIPS, 90,000+ citations)
- "Seminal works in quantum computing" (expect: papers from Nature, Science by leading researchers)
- "Key studies on climate change mitigation" (expect: IPCC-cited papers, Nature Climate Change)
- "Landmark trials in cancer immunotherapy" (expect: NEJM, Lancet trials with 1000+ citations)
Expected Response Format:
- 5-10 most influential papers, ranked by impact and relevance
- Complete citation information (authors, title, journal, year, DOI)
- Citation count for each paper (approximate if exact unavailable)
- Venue tier indication (Nature, Science, Cell = Tier 1, etc.)
- Brief description of each paper's contribution
- Author credentials when notable (e.g., "from the Hinton lab", "Nobel laureate")
- Journal impact factors when relevant
Quality Criteria for Citation Selection:
- Prefer papers with 100+ citations (for papers 3+ years old)
- Prioritize Tier-1 journals (Nature, Science, Cell, NEJM, Lancet)
- Include work from recognized leaders in the field
- Balance foundational papers (high citations, older) with recent advances (emerging, high-impact venues)
Automatic Model Selection
This skill features intelligent model selection based on query complexity:
Model Types
1. Sonar Pro Search (perplexity/sonar-pro-search)
- Use Case: Straightforward information lookup
- Best For:
- Simple fact-finding queries
- Recent publication searches
- Basic protocol lookups
- Statistical data retrieval
- Speed: Fast responses
- Cost: Lower cost per query
2. Sonar Reasoning Pro (perplexity/sonar-reasoning-pro)
- Use Case: Complex analytical queries requiring deep reasoning
- Best For:
- Comparative analysis ("compare X vs Y")
- Synthesis of multiple studies
- Evaluating trade-offs or controversies
- Explaining mechanisms or relationships
- Critical analysis and interpretation
- Speed: Slower but more thorough
- Cost: Higher cost per query, but provides deeper insights
Complexity Assessment
The skill automatically detects query complexity using these indicators:
Reasoning Keywords (triggers Sonar Reasoning Pro):
- Analytical:
compare, contrast, analyze, analysis, evaluate, critique
- Comparative:
versus, vs, vs., compared to, differences between, similarities
- Synthesis:
meta-analysis, systematic review, synthesis, integrate
- Causal:
mechanism, why, how does, how do, explain, relationship, causal relationship, underlying mechanism
- Theoretical:
theoretical framework, implications, interpret, reasoning
- Debate:
controversy, conflicting, paradox, debate, reconcile
- Trade-offs:
pros and cons, advantages and disadvantages, trade-off, tradeoff, trade offs
- Complexity:
multifaceted, complex interaction, critical analysis
Complexity Scoring:
- Reasoning keywords: 3 points each (heavily weighted)
- Multiple questions: 2 points per question mark
- Complex sentence structures: 1.5 points per clause indicator (and, or, but, however, whereas, although)
- Very long queries: 1 point if >150 characters
- Threshold: Queries scoring ≥3 points trigger Sonar Reasoning Pro
Practical Result: Even a single strong reasoning keyword (compare, explain, analyze, etc.) will trigger the more powerful Sonar Reasoning Pro model, ensuring you get deep analysis when needed.
Example Query Classification:
✅ Sonar Pro Search (straightforward lookup):
- "Recent advances in CRISPR gene editing 2024"
- "Prevalence of diabetes in US population"
- "Western blot protocol for protein detection"
✅ Sonar Reasoning Pro (complex analysis):
- "Compare and contrast mRNA vaccines vs traditional vaccines for cancer treatment"
- "Explain the mechanism underlying the relationship between gut microbiome and depression"
- "Analyze the controversy surrounding AI in medical diagnosis and evaluate trade-offs"
Manual Override
You can force a specific model using the force_model parameter:
research = ResearchLookup(force_model='pro')
research = ResearchLookup(force_model='reasoning')
research = ResearchLookup()
Command-line usage:
python research_lookup.py "your query" --force-model pro
python research_lookup.py "your query" --force-model reasoning
python research_lookup.py "your query"
python research_lookup.py "your query" -o results.txt
python research_lookup.py "your query" --json
python research_lookup.py "your query" --json -o results.json
Technical Integration
OpenRouter API Configuration
This skill integrates with OpenRouter (openrouter.ai) to access Perplexity's Sonar models:
Model Specifications:
- Models:
perplexity/sonar-pro-search (fast lookup)perplexity/sonar-reasoning-pro-online (deep analysis)
- Search Mode: Academic/scholarly mode (prioritizes peer-reviewed sources)
- Search Context: Always uses
high search context for deeper, more comprehensive research results
- Context Window: 200K+ tokens for comprehensive research
- Capabilities: Academic paper search, citation generation, scholarly analysis
- Output: Rich responses with citations and source links from academic databases
API Requirements:
- OpenRouter API key (set as
OPENROUTER_API_KEY environment variable)
- Account with sufficient credits for research queries
- Proper attribution and citation of sources
Academic Mode Configuration:
- System message configured to prioritize scholarly sources
- Search focused on peer-reviewed journals and academic publications
- Enhanced citation extraction for academic references
- Preference for recent academic literature (2020-2024)
- Direct access to academic databases and repositories
Response Quality and Reliability
Source Verification: The skill prioritizes:
- Peer-reviewed academic papers and journals
- Reputable institutional sources (universities, government agencies, NGOs)
- Recent publications (within last 2-3 years preferred)
- High-impact journals and conferences
- Primary research over secondary sources
Citation Standards: All responses include:
- Complete bibliographic information
- DOI or stable URLs when available
- Access dates for web sources
- Clear attribution of direct quotes or data
Paper Quality and Popularity Prioritization
CRITICAL: When searching for papers, ALWAYS prioritize high-quality, influential papers over obscure or low-impact publications. Quality matters more than quantity.
Citation-Based Ranking
Prioritize papers based on citation count relative to their age:
| Paper Age | Citation Threshold | Classification |
|---|
| 0-3 years | 20+ citations | Noteworthy |
| 0-3 years | 100+ citations | Highly Influential |
| 3-7 years | 100+ citations | Significant |
| 3-7 years | 500+ citations | Landmark Paper |
| 7+ years | 500+ citations | Seminal Work |
| 7+ years | 1000+ citations | Foundational |
When reporting citations: Always indicate approximate citation count when known (e.g., "cited 500+ times" or "highly cited").
Venue Quality Tiers
Prioritize papers from higher-tier venues:
Tier 1 - Premier Venues (Always prefer):
- General Science: Nature, Science, Cell, PNAS
- Medicine: NEJM, Lancet, JAMA, BMJ
- Field-Specific Flagships: Nature Medicine, Nature Biotechnology, Nature Methods, Nature Genetics, Cell Stem Cell, Immunity
- Top CS/AI: NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, CVPR (for ML/AI topics)
Tier 2 - High-Impact Specialized (Strong preference):
- Journals with Impact Factor > 10
- Top conferences in subfields (e.g., EMNLP, NAACL, ECCV, MICCAI)
- Society flagship journals (e.g., Blood, Circulation, Gastroenterology)
Tier 3 - Respected Specialized (Include when relevant):
- Journals with Impact Factor 5-10
- Established conferences in the field
- Well-indexed specialized journals
Tier 4 - Other Peer-Reviewed (Use sparingly):
- Lower-impact journals, only if directly relevant and no better source exists
Author Reputation Indicators
Prefer papers from established, reputable researchers:
- Senior authors with high h-index (>40 in established fields)
- Multiple publications in Tier-1 venues
- Leadership positions at recognized research institutions
- Recognized expertise: Awards, editorial positions, society fellows
- First/last author on landmark papers in the field
Direct Relevance Scoring
Always prioritize papers that directly address the research question:
- Primary Priority: Papers directly addressing the exact research question
- Secondary Priority: Papers with applicable methods, data, or conceptual frameworks
- Tertiary Priority: Tangentially related papers (include ONLY if from Tier-1 venues or highly cited)
Practical Application
When conducting research lookups:
- Start with the most influential papers - Look for highly-cited, foundational work first
- Prioritize Tier-1 venues - Nature, Science, Cell family journals, NEJM, Lancet for medical topics
- Check author credentials - Prefer work from established research groups
- Balance recency with impact - Recent highly-cited papers > older obscure papers > recent uncited papers
- Report quality indicators - Include citation counts, journal names, and author affiliations in responses
Example Quality-Focused Query Response:
Key findings from high-impact literature:
1. Smith et al. (2023), Nature Medicine (IF: 82.9, cited 450+ times)
- Senior author: Prof. John Smith, Harvard Medical School
- Key finding: [finding]
2. Johnson & Lee (2024), Cell (IF: 64.5, cited 120+ times)
- From the renowned Lee Lab at Stanford
- Key finding: [finding]
3. Chen et al. (2022), NEJM (IF: 158.5, cited 890+ times)
- Landmark clinical trial (N=5,000)
- Key finding: [finding]
Query Best Practices
1. Model Selection Strategy
For Simple Lookups (Sonar Pro Search):
- Recent papers on a specific topic
- Statistical data or prevalence rates
- Standard protocols or methodologies
- Citation finding for specific papers
- Factual information retrieval
For Complex Analysis (Sonar Reasoning Pro):
- Comparative studies and synthesis
- Mechanism explanations
- Controversy evaluation
- Trade-off analysis
- Theoretical frameworks
- Multi-faceted relationships
Pro Tip: The automatic selection is optimized for most use cases. Only use force_model if you have specific requirements or know the query needs deeper reasoning than detected.
2. Specific and Focused Queries
Good Queries (will trigger appropriate model):
- "Randomized controlled trials of mRNA vaccines for cancer treatment 2023-2024" → Sonar Pro Search
- "Compare the efficacy and safety of mRNA vaccines vs traditional vaccines for cancer treatment" → Sonar Reasoning Pro
- "Explain the mechanism by which CRISPR off-target effects occur and strategies to minimize them" → Sonar Reasoning Pro
Poor Queries:
- "Tell me about AI" (too broad)
- "Cancer research" (lacks specificity)
- "Latest news" (too vague)
3. Structured Query Format
Recommended Structure:
[Topic] + [Specific Aspect] + [Time Frame] + [Type of Information]
Examples:
- "CRISPR gene editing + off-target effects + 2024 + clinical trials"
- "Quantum computing + error correction + recent advances + review papers"
- "Renewable energy + solar efficiency + 2023-2024 + statistical data"
4. Follow-up Queries
Effective Follow-ups:
- "Show me the full citation for the Smith et al. 2024 paper"
- "What are the limitations of this methodology?"
- "Find similar studies using different approaches"
- "What controversies exist in this research area?"
Integration with Scientific Writing
This skill enhances scientific writing by providing:
- Literature Review Support: Gather current research for introduction and discussion sections
- Methods Validation: Verify protocols and procedures against current standards
- Results Contextualization: Compare findings with recent similar studies
- Discussion Enhancement: Support arguments with latest evidence
- Citation Management: Provide properly formatted citations in multiple styles
Error Handling and Limitations
Known Limitations:
- Information cutoff: Responses limited to training data (typically 2023-2024)
- Paywall content: May not access full text behind paywalls
- Emerging research: May miss very recent papers not yet indexed
- Specialized databases: Cannot access proprietary or restricted databases
Error Conditions:
- API rate limits or quota exceeded
- Network connectivity issues
- Malformed or ambiguous queries
- Model unavailability or maintenance
Fallback Strategies:
- Rephrase queries for better clarity
- Break complex queries into simpler components
- Use broader time frames if recent data unavailable
- Cross-reference with multiple query variations
Usage Examples
Example 1: Simple Literature Search (Sonar Pro Search)
Query: "Recent advances in transformer attention mechanisms 2024"
Model Selected: Sonar Pro Search (straightforward lookup)
Response Includes:
- Summary of 5 key papers from 2024
- Complete citations with DOIs
- Key innovations and improvements
- Performance benchmarks
- Future research directions
Example 2: Comparative Analysis (Sonar Reasoning Pro)
Query: "Compare and contrast the advantages and limitations of transformer-based models versus traditional RNNs for sequence modeling"
Model Selected: Sonar Reasoning Pro (complex analysis required)
Response Includes:
- Detailed comparison across multiple dimensions
- Analysis of architectural differences
- Trade-offs in computational efficiency vs performance
- Use case recommendations
- Synthesis of evidence from multiple studies
- Discussion of ongoing debates in the field
Example 3: Method Verification (Sonar Pro Search)
Query: "Standard protocols for flow cytometry analysis"
Model Selected: Sonar Pro Search (protocol lookup)
Response Includes:
- Step-by-step protocol from recent review
- Required controls and calibrations
- Common pitfalls and troubleshooting
- Reference to definitive methodology paper
- Alternative approaches with pros/cons
Example 4: Mechanism Explanation (Sonar Reasoning Pro)
Query: "Explain the underlying mechanism of how mRNA vaccines trigger immune responses and why they differ from traditional vaccines"
Model Selected: Sonar Reasoning Pro (requires causal reasoning)
Response Includes:
- Detailed mechanistic explanation
- Step-by-step biological processes
- Comparative analysis with traditional vaccines
- Molecular-level interactions
- Integration of immunology and pharmacology concepts
- Evidence from recent research
Example 5: Statistical Data (Sonar Pro Search)
Query: "Global AI adoption in healthcare statistics 2024"
Model Selected: Sonar Pro Search (data lookup)
Response Includes:
- Current adoption rates by region
- Market size and growth projections
- Survey methodology and sample size
- Comparison with previous years
- Citations to market research reports
Performance and Cost Considerations
Response Times
Sonar Pro Search:
- Typical response time: 5-15 seconds
- Best for rapid information gathering
- Suitable for batch queries
Sonar Reasoning Pro:
- Typical response time: 15-45 seconds
- Worth the wait for complex analytical queries
- Provides more thorough reasoning and synthesis
Cost Optimization
Automatic Selection Benefits:
- Saves costs by using Sonar Pro Search for straightforward queries
- Reserves Sonar Reasoning Pro for queries that truly benefit from deeper analysis
- Optimizes the balance between cost and quality
Manual Override Use Cases:
- Force Sonar Pro Search when budget is constrained and speed is priority
- Force Sonar Reasoning Pro when working on critical research requiring maximum depth
- Use for specific sections of papers (e.g., Pro Search for methods, Reasoning for discussion)
Best Practices:
- Trust the automatic selection for most use cases
- Review query results - if Sonar Pro Search doesn't provide sufficient depth, rephrase with reasoning keywords
- Use batch queries strategically - combine simple lookups to minimize total query count
- For literature reviews, start with Sonar Pro Search for breadth, then use Sonar Reasoning Pro for synthesis
Security and Ethical Considerations
Responsible Use:
- Verify all information against primary sources when possible
- Clearly attribute all data and quotes to original sources
- Avoid presenting AI-generated summaries as original research
- Respect copyright and licensing restrictions
- Use for research assistance, not to bypass paywalls or subscriptions
Academic Integrity:
- Always cite original sources, not the AI tool
- Use as a starting point for literature searches
- Follow institutional guidelines for AI tool usage
- Maintain transparency about research methods
Complementary Tools
In addition to research-lookup, the scientific writer has access to WebSearch for:
- Quick metadata verification: Look up DOIs, publication years, journal names, volume/page numbers
- Non-academic sources: News, blogs, technical documentation, current events
- General information: Company info, product details, current statistics
- Cross-referencing: Verify citation details found through research-lookup
When to use which tool:
| Task | Tool |
|---|
| Find academic papers | research-lookup |
| Literature search | research-lookup |
| Deep analysis/comparison | research-lookup (Sonar Reasoning Pro) |
| Look up DOI/metadata | WebSearch |
| Verify publication year | WebSearch |
| Find journal volume/pages | WebSearch |
| Current events/news | WebSearch |
| Non-scholarly sources | WebSearch |
Summary
This skill serves as a powerful research assistant with intelligent dual-model selection:
- Automatic Intelligence: Analyzes query complexity and selects the optimal model (Sonar Pro Search or Sonar Reasoning Pro)
- Cost-Effective: Uses faster, cheaper Sonar Pro Search for straightforward lookups
- Deep Analysis: Automatically engages Sonar Reasoning Pro for complex comparative, analytical, and theoretical queries
- Flexible Control: Manual override available when you know exactly what level of analysis you need
- Academic Focus: Both models configured to prioritize peer-reviewed sources and scholarly literature
- Complementary WebSearch: Use alongside WebSearch for metadata verification and non-academic sources
Whether you need quick fact-finding or deep analytical synthesis, this skill automatically adapts to deliver the right level of research support for your scientific writing needs.
