القائمة
Compare 2+ options with a dedicated advocate for each, counter-advocates who challenge every position, and a referee who ranks what survives.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Generate a wide field of ideas, then pressure-test them. Five generators diverge, two challengers prune the weak ones, three synthesizers rank what survives.
Three-agent adversarial bug finder. Hunter overclaims every issue it can find, Skeptic disproves what it can, Referee arbitrates what survives. Scoring incentives force each role to behave honestly.
Dialectic process for reviewing, brainstorming, comparing tradeoffs, or stress-testing plans. Configurable modes, agent counts, and expert lenses.
Execute a pre-defined plan using implementation agents (no design changes)
Capture structured learnings (gotcha, pattern, decision, bug-fix) as JSONL per project. Cross-project searchable.
Assume the plan failed — then explain why. Three pessimists write failure narratives, two optimists rebut, a risk assessor weighs which failure modes are real.
| name | tradeoff |
| description | Compare 2+ options with a dedicated advocate for each, counter-advocates who challenge every position, and a referee who ranks what survives. |
Run /dialectic-review --tradeoff $ARGUMENTS
Read ~/.claude/skills/dialectic-review/SKILL.md for argument parsing, then read ~/.claude/skills/dialectic-review/tradeoff-prompts.md for the phase prompts. Follow the full three-phase process defined there. Any /dialectic-review flag is valid here — it passes straight through.
