القائمة
Create governance polls in GitHub Discussions when community input would improve decision quality — used sparingly for genuine decisions
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Use when a pull request needs review by a different AI model than the one that authored it, or when configuring cross-model code review pipelines in CI/CD.
Run Demerzel's autonomous driver — full cycle or individual phases across all repos
Capture meaningful session state (current cursor, in-flight work, live hypotheses, open questions, do-NOT-carry-forward, success criteria) to state/digests/latest.md so the next session — including one after auto-compaction — can re-enter without re-discovering context cold. Distinct from /learnings (which captures surprises). Validates against docs/contracts/digest-schema.json.
Autonomous research scheduler — selects the most under-researched department by coverage ratio, generates questions from completeness gaps, cross-model validates, auto-produces courses at T>=0.8, rate-limited to 6 cycles/day with kill switch
Personalized AI tutor — turns any topic into a customized, progress-tracked learning course. Use when the user wants to LEARN a concept, skill, language, tool, or domain. Creates a MISSION, curated RESOURCES, iterative lessons with self-checks, and learning-records that persist across sessions. NOT for interrogating the user about their own design (use brainstorming/IDSD for that).
Run one bounded supervised autonomous cycle on the Demerzel governance repo. Picks the smallest unchecked governance slice inside allow_edit, implements it, runs the oracle (`pwsh scripts/verify.ps1`), emits cycle evidence, and stops. Refuses to run unless dev-process-overseer reports loop-eligible and the preflight passes. Use when asked to "run one supervised loop", "advance governance autonomously", or "do one cycle and stop".
| name | demerzel-poll |
| description | Create governance polls in GitHub Discussions when community input would improve decision quality — used sparingly for genuine decisions |
Create polls for genuine governance decisions where community input improves quality. Used sparingly — not for trivial decisions.
/demerzel poll [question] — create a poll with options
Only create polls when ALL of these are true:
/demerzel consult with ChatGPT instead)Polls use GitHub Discussions in the Polls category:
gh api graphql -f query='mutation {
createDiscussion(input: {
repositoryId: "R_kgDORnMyyQ",
categoryId: "DIC_kwDORnMyyc4C4eDX",
title: "📊 Poll: [Your question]",
body: "[Context and options — use markdown checkboxes or numbered options]"
}) {
discussion { url }
}
}'
Category ID for Polls: DIC_kwDORnMyyc4C4eDX
## 📊 [Question]
[Brief context — why this matters]
### Options
- 👍 React with 👍 for Option A: [description]
- 🎉 React with 🎉 for Option B: [description]
- ❤️ React with ❤️ for Option C: [description]
- 🚀 React with 🚀 for Option D: [description]
**Voting closes:** [date, minimum 3 days out]
*Poll created by Demerzel governance. Results will be considered for the [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/GuitarAlchemist/projects/2).*
Maximum 1 poll per month. Track in the evolution log. If the ideation workflow detects a poll-worthy situation, it proposes the poll but does not create it — waits for the monthly slot.
constitutions/demerzel-mandate.md Section 2 (Jurisdiction — community governance), policies/kaizen-policy.yaml (community input for innovative Kaizen)