القائمة
AI-DLC workflow composition. Composes the adaptive workflow conversationally with the human — selecting stages, assigning personas, and handling artifact sourcing. Read by the orchestrator after kickoff.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Design clear, versioned, backward-compatible interfaces and contracts between units, services, and external consumers. Applies wherever interfaces/contracts are designed or reviewed.
Evaluate software architecture for sound boundaries, intentional coupling, explicit trade-offs, scalability, deployability, operability, and failure behaviour. Applies wherever architectural decisions are designed or reviewed.
Identify and define the core domain concepts of a system — components, entities, relationships, ownership boundaries, and the language the system speaks. Applies wherever domain structure, entity ownership, or business capability boundaries are designed or reviewed.
Apply disciplined implementation practices across backend, frontend, infrastructure, configuration, and tests: write-test-verify, repository convention matching, integration boundary control, and appropriate test strategy.
AI-DLC workspace kickoff. Handles the welcome banner and workspace setup — creating the intent directory, state file, and audit file. Read by the orchestrator at the start of every new intent.
AI-DLC workflow orchestrator. Activate whenever the user states a fresh development intent — building, creating, implementing, fixing, migrating, refactoring, or adding a feature to a codebase. Use this skill for any free-form development prompt such as "build X", "add feature Y", "migrate Z to W", "fix the bug in V", "refactor U", or "create a new service for T".
| name | aidlc-workflow-composition |
| description | AI-DLC workflow composition. Composes the adaptive workflow conversationally with the human — selecting stages, assigning personas, and handling artifact sourcing. Read by the orchestrator after kickoff. |
Compose the adaptive workflow for this intent. This is a conversation, not a form. Paraphrase what you understand, identify what's needed, ask the minimum questions to proceed, then propose.
Read stages/stage-graph.md — understand what stages exist and their composition rules.
Paraphrase the intent — restate what you understand in your own words. Show the human you get it.
Integration scan — before composing, explicitly list ALL potential integrations and external dependencies you detect in the intent. Include borderline ones. Present them to the human and ask: "For any of these, do you have existing implementations or reference codebases I should study?" This determines whether reverse-engineering is needed. Look for: auth providers (SSO, OAuth, SAML), messaging APIs (WhatsApp, SMS, email), data APIs (ISBN, maps, weather), storage services (photo/file uploads), payment gateways, notification services, third-party SDKs, existing internal systems being connected to.
Existing artifacts scan — if the human mentions they already have artifacts (stories, requirements, wireframes, designs, code), explicitly list what you detected and for each ask: skip the stage entirely, validate/review what they have, or augment it? Ask how to source them (paste, file path, MCP). Do not silently decide to skip — always confirm with the human what they want done with existing work.
Identify what's implied — greenfield or brownfield? Simple or complex? What stages are obviously needed, what can be skipped?
Ask only what you can't infer — don't ask 10 questions. Ask the 1-2 that actually affect the workflow (beyond the integration scan).
Propose the workflow — present as a table with columns: #, Stage, Owner, Contributors, Reviewer. Add a brief rationale paragraph below the table. Use language like "Here's what I think we could do" and "What do you think?"
Offer to adjust — after presenting the proposal, offer context-specific options derived from the actual workflow you just proposed. Examples of what to surface (pick what's relevant, not all):
These should be actionable suggestions based on the proposed workflow, not generic boilerplate.
Handle artifacts the human already has — if they mention existing docs, stories, or wireframes, ask how to source them (paste, file path, MCP) or offer to generate.
When the human references an existing artifact (a story, a requirement, a wireframe):
"I need the [artifact] to proceed. How would you like to provide it? a) Paste it here in chat b) Point me to a file path or MCP source c) I'll generate it for you — then you review"
Based on the answer: receive it, write it to the stage directory, set status to artifact-generated, then proceed (offer review or move to next stage).
These are internal reasoning aids. Do not reference them by name to the human.
Example 1: Simple bug fix
Human: "Fix the null pointer in the login handler"
Orchestrator: "Got it — a null pointer fix in the login handler. That's a targeted brownfield bug fix. I'd suggest: code-generation. Does the codebase have existing context in org-ai-kb, or should I reverse-engineer the login module first?"
Example 2: Feature on existing system
Human: "I want to work on story-2041: add a dropdown to an existing page"
Orchestrator: "Story-2041 — adding a dropdown to an existing page. Small brownfield UI change. I need the story details. Would you like to paste it, point me to a file, or should I generate it from what you've described?
For the implementation I'd suggest: code-generation. Do you want the code reviewed by a solutions architect, or is this straightforward enough to skip reviews?"
Example 3: Greenfield system
Human: "Build a library management app with admin and member roles"
Orchestrator: "A library management app — two roles, multiple features. Here's what I think we could do:
# Stage Owner Contributors Reviewer 1 Requirements analysis aidlc-product-manager-agent aidlc-systems-architect-agent aidlc-product-lead-agent 2 Story generation aidlc-product-manager-agent aidlc-systems-architect-agent aidlc-product-lead-agent 3 Wireframe design aidlc-ux-designer-agent aidlc-product-manager-agent, aidlc-systems-architect-agent aidlc-product-lead-agent 4 Domain design aidlc-app-architect-agent aidlc-product-manager-agent aidlc-architecture-reviewer-agent 5 Units generation aidlc-app-architect-agent aidlc-product-manager-agent aidlc-architecture-reviewer-agent 6 Contract design aidlc-app-architect-agent aidlc-product-manager-agent aidlc-architecture-reviewer-agent 7 Functional design aidlc-systems-architect-agent aidlc-product-manager-agent aidlc-architecture-reviewer-agent 8 NFR design aidlc-systems-architect-agent — aidlc-architecture-reviewer-agent 9 Infrastructure design aidlc-systems-architect-agent — aidlc-architecture-reviewer-agent 10 Code generation aidlc-sw-dev-engineer-agent aidlc-systems-architect-agent aidlc-code-reviewer-agent Rationale: full system with auth, integrations, and two user roles warrants the complete workflow with reviews.
A couple of questions:
- Do you want architecture review at each stage? I'd recommend it, but if you want a faster pass I can skip.
- Any existing artifacts (requirements, wireframes, designs) you want to bring in?"
Example 4: Human has artifacts
Human: "I have a requirements doc and wireframes already. Start from stories."
Orchestrator: "Got it — you have requirements and wireframes. I'll skip those stages. Can you point me to the files?
Then I'll compose: story-generation → domain-design → units-generation → functional-design → code-generation. With your requirements and wireframes feeding into stories as context."
Example 5: Wireframes first
Human: "We want to start with wireframes for a library app"
Orchestrator: "Wireframes first — makes sense for a UI-heavy app. I'll compose: wireframe-design as the primary stage.
Do you want an architecture review on the wireframes, or keep it lightweight?"
Example 6: Migration
Human: "Migrate our Express API to Fastify"
Orchestrator: "Express to Fastify migration — brownfield platform change. Does org-ai-kb have context on this repo, or should I reverse-engineer it?
Proposed flow: reverse-engineering → requirements-analysis → domain-design → units-generation → functional-design → code-generation."
Persist the composed workflow as workflow.json in the intent directory per conventions/workflow-schema.json. This is the contract for this intent's execution. Create inception stage output directories for each selected inception stage. Per-unit construction stage directories are created after units-generation determines the units.
