sdlc

name	sdlc
description	Route a task to the next synced SDLC workflow based on current artifacts and repo state.
metadata	{"triggers":{"keywords":["sdlc","workflow"]}}

Sdlc Skill

[!IMPORTANT] Route a task to the next synced SDLC workflow based on current artifacts and repo state.

Optional args: slug=, ticket=<id/url>, mode=interactive|autonomous|channel, channel=, auto_continue=true|false.

Instructions

When the user asks to perform this workflow, execute the following steps:

SDLC Router Workflow

Goal: Select the next native workflow without loading every workflow body, while preserving a traceable BA -> PM -> IT Department handoff for offshore delivery.

Steps

1. Inspect state:

   • User request
   • Search docs/brd/, docs/prd/, and docs/srs/ for a matching [slug]; if absent, use the newest BRD or git status.
   • If multiple candidates exist, list them and ask whether to focus, consolidate, or sequence.
   • Baseline reference: docs/requirements-standards-baseline.md
   • Existing ticket, BRD-lite brief, PRD, SRS/FRS design, implementation plan, task list, walkthrough, release notes, and retro
   • Jira, ADO, Zephyr, or other MCP context when already configured
   • Changed files and current test status
   • Offshore delivery context: business owner, product owner, implementation owners, QA owner, timezone/cadence constraints, environments, release window, and dependency teams
   • Requirement trace health: BRD-OBJ-* -> REQ-* -> AC-* -> SRS-* -> test evidence

2. Choose next workflow:

   • Unclear idea, missing business case, missing stakeholder owner, or missing measurable value (BRD-lite / Why, BA-owned intake) -> brainstorm-feature
   • BRD-lite exists or business direction is clear but product scope, priorities, acceptance criteria, rollout, or delivery plan are unclear (PRD / What, PM-owned planning) -> plan-feature
   • PRD exists but technical behavior/contracts unclear (SRS/FRS / How) -> design-solution
   • Architecture, auth, trust boundaries, compliance controls, or agent/runtime safety need deeper technical validation -> design-solution
   • BRD-lite, PRD, or SRS/FRS exists but readiness unclear -> implementation-readiness
   • Approved plan needs code -> implement-feature
   • Bug ticket needs fix -> dev-fix
   • Ticket or cross-functional change needs specialist fanout, AC coverage, and PR metadata review -> review-ticket
   • PR diff needs focused merge-risk review -> code-review
   • Code complete but unproven -> verify-work

3. Enforce handoff quality:

   • BA output must include business objective, stakeholder/validation owner, AS-IS/TO-BE, SMART metric, scope fence, risks, assumptions, and BRD objective IDs.
   • PM output must link each PRD requirement and AC to a BRD objective, name requirement owners/status/priority, define rollout/ops, and identify whether design-solution is required.
   • IT Department handoff must include implementation owner candidates, affected repos/modules, test lanes, environments, release/rollback notes, and open blockers.
   • Never route directly to implementation when BRD/PRD/SRS trace or testable ACs are missing.

4. Set runtime state:

   • Interactive: ask max 3 blocking questions.
   • Autonomous/channel: continue only when required artifacts and owners are known; otherwise return BLOCKED.
   • Emit next workflow, handoff payload, verification command, and owner.

Output Template

# SDLC Route

## Recommended Workflow

## Requirement Layer

## Handoff Owner

## Required Input

## Blocking Gaps

## Offshore Delivery Notes

## Runtime Contract

## Handoff Payload

## Blocking Questions

## Next Workflow

## Verification Command

## Cost Report
Call `get_session_cost(workflow="sdlc")` before final handoff.