| name | traceability-audit |
| description | Map requirements, acceptance criteria, implementation, tests, and release artifacts into one traceability report. |
| metadata | {"triggers":{"keywords":["traceability audit","workflow"]}} |
Traceability Audit Skill
[!IMPORTANT]
Map requirements, acceptance criteria, implementation, tests, and release artifacts into one traceability report.
Optional args: slug=, ticket=<id/url>, mode=interactive|autonomous|channel, channel=, auto_continue=true|false.
Instructions
When the user asks to perform this workflow, execute the following steps:
Traceability Audit Workflow
Goal: Prove every acceptance criterion has implementation and verification evidence before release or handoff.
Steps
- Load sources:
- BRD-lite, PRD, SRS/FRS, AC list, implementation plan, changed files, tests, walkthrough, PR comments, release notes.
- Jira/GitHub/GitLab/ADO/Zephyr/Confluence MCPs when configured; otherwise use exported files and local evidence.
- Build trace map:
- BRD objective -> PRD requirement ID.
- PRD requirement ID -> SRS/FRS contract.
- AC -> implementation file/function.
- AC -> automated test, manual/Zephyr TC, or verification step.
- Release note -> shipped user-visible change.
- Classify each AC:
- Covered: code and verification evidence exists.
- Partial: code or evidence incomplete.
- Missing: no implementation or no verification.
- Out of scope: explicitly deferred with owner/link.
- Flag gaps:
- Missing requirement mapping.
- Missing AC implementation.
- Missing test or manual coverage.
- Release note missing shipped user impact.
Output Template
# Traceability Audit
## Summary
## Requirement Map
| Requirement | SRS/FRS Contract | Verification | Status |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [REQ] | [contract] | [test/evidence] | [status] |
## Gaps
## Next Workflow
## Cost Report