بنقرة واحدة
infra-container-build-review
Container build review: Dockerfiles, image size, layers, SBOM, CVEs, reproducibility.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Container build review: Dockerfiles, image size, layers, SBOM, CVEs, reproducibility.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
.NET API review: architecture, validation, auth, EF Core, jobs, deployment, tests.
Effect TS review: services, layers, errors, Schema, concurrency, resources, tests.
Hey API review: OpenAPI specs, generated clients, SDKs, auth, validation, CI.
Container runtime review: env, secrets, health checks, resources, volumes, shutdown.
Production readiness review: deploy, rollback, monitoring, capacity, backups, runbooks.
Evidence-first bugfix workflow by workflow mode.
| name | infra-container-build-review |
| description | Container build review: Dockerfiles, image size, layers, SBOM, CVEs, reproducibility. |
Review image reproducibility, size, base image risk, secrets in builds, non-root runtime, SBOM/provenance, and scan gates.
For broad or materially risky pull requests, recommend focused additional review only when independent expertise is likely to improve the verdict. Judge this from concrete risk, novelty, blast radius, reversibility, and context size—not file count or category matching alone. Small and conventional changes should remain one pragmatic pass.
When additional reviewers add value, split only by independent material surfaces. Each returns concrete evidence-based findings; the main agent removes duplicates and false positives and owns the proportional final verdict.
Prefer job specs, Dockerfiles, proxy config, deployment manifests, logs, metrics, health checks, and runbook steps over assumptions.