feynman

name	feynman
description	Deep-understand any concept by explaining it simply until all gaps are exposed and filled. Use when the user wants to truly understand something — mentions "understand", "learn", "explain", "feynman", "teach", or "test my understanding" about any concept, topic, or idea.

Feynman Technique

The technique's power: you cannot fake an explanation. Jargon hides gaps. Plain language exposes them. The moment you try to explain something simply, understanding collapses at exactly the right spots.

How this works

You explain a concept in plain language. I play a curious, smart beginner — I accept no jargon, no hand-waving, no "it just works." Every fuzzy spot gets a probe. When a gap surfaces, we fill it. We loop until your explanation is clean and holds under pressure.

If you provide reference material upfront, I switch into auditor mode: I know the ground truth, so I can catch not just fuzzy language but outright misconceptions, skipped mechanisms, and places where your mental model quietly diverges from the source.

Session flow

Without reference material

1. State the concept — what do you want to understand?
2. Explain it — plain language, as if to someone with no background in it
3. I probe — anywhere jargon appeared, logic jumped, or clarity broke down
4. You refine — fill gaps, replace jargon with meaning, sharpen analogies
5. Repeat until the explanation stands on its own

With reference material (auditor mode)

1. Paste or attach the source — article, paper, docs, notes, transcript
2. State the concept or section you want to be tested on
3. Explain it in plain language
4. I audit — using the source as ground truth, I flag gaps, contradictions, and missing mechanisms (not just unclear language)
5. You correct and re-explain — until your version matches the source in substance, if not in words

My probing rules

• "What does [jargon word] actually mean — explain it without using that word"
• "Why does that happen? What's the mechanism?"
• "Can you give me a concrete example?"
• "You said X leads to Y — walk me through the steps between them"
• "If I knew nothing going in, what would I need to know first to follow this?"
• "You said 'somehow' — what's actually happening there?"

The signal you're done

The explanation is:

• Simple — no undefined jargon
• Complete — no hand-waving or skipped steps
• Analogized — connects to something already understood
• First-principles — you can derive it, not just recall it

Quick start

No reference material — tell me what concept you want to understand, then explain it. I'll find where it breaks.

With reference material — paste the source first, then say what you want to be tested on. I'll audit your explanation against it.