speckit-constitution

name	speckit-constitution
description	Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs, ensuring all dependent templates stay in sync

Speckit-Constitution: Project Principles Management

Purpose

Create or update the project constitution - a set of non-negotiable principles and standards that govern all specifications, plans, and implementations in the project.

What is a Constitution?

The constitution (specify/memory/constitution.md) defines:

• MUST principles: Non-negotiable requirements (always enforced)
• SHOULD principles: Strong recommendations (justify if violated)
• Project standards: Coding style, architecture patterns, quality gates
• Technical constraints: Required/forbidden technologies
• Quality gates: Review requirements, testing standards, documentation needs

Prerequisites

• Project repository initialized
• .specify/ directory structure (created by setup scripts)

What This Skill Does

1. Loads existing constitution (if exists)
2. Gathers principle inputs from user interactively
3. Creates/updates constitution document
4. Ensures all dependent templates stay in sync
5. Validates principle consistency
6. Reports changes made

Key Principles

Constitution Authority

• Non-negotiable within scope: All specs and plans must comply
• Explicit violations: Must be justified in writing
• Cannot be silently ignored: Tools check compliance automatically
• Change via update: Modify constitution, don't violate it

Template Synchronization

When constitution updates:

• Spec template updates to reflect new quality gates
• Plan template updates to enforce new technical constraints
• Task template updates to include new validation steps
• Checklist templates update to check new principles

Execution Flow

All execution logic is now contained within this skill. The skill handles:

• Constitution loading/creation
• Principle gathering
• Template synchronization

Quick Summary

1. Load existing constitution (if exists) from .specify/memory/constitution.md
2. Gather inputs:
   • User-provided principles
   • Interactive questions if needed
   • Technical constraints
   • Quality standards
3. Create/update constitution:
   • Organize principles by category
   • Mark MUST vs SHOULD
   • Document rationale
4. Sync dependent templates:
   • Update spec template
   • Update plan template
   • Update task template
   • Update checklist templates
5. Report changes: List new/modified principles

Constitution Structure

Recommended Sections

# Project Constitution

## Core Principles

### Architecture
- [MUST] Use microservices pattern for backend services
- [SHOULD] Prefer REST over GraphQL for public APIs

### Security
- [MUST] All data encrypted at rest and in transit
- [MUST] Authentication required for all protected resources
- [SHOULD] Use OAuth2 for third-party integrations

### Quality
- [MUST] All code must pass linting before commit
- [MUST] Test coverage ≥80% for all new code
- [SHOULD] Performance budgets defined for critical paths

### Technology Constraints
- [MUST] Use TypeScript (no JavaScript)
- [MUST] PostgreSQL for relational data
- [FORBIDDEN] MongoDB, MySQL (use PostgreSQL instead)

### Documentation
- [MUST] All public APIs have OpenAPI specs
- [SHOULD] All components have README files
- [SHOULD] Architecture decisions recorded in ADRs

## Quality Gates

### Specification Phase
- [ ] No implementation details in spec.md
- [ ] All success criteria measurable
- [ ] All user stories have acceptance criteria

### Planning Phase
- [ ] All design decisions documented in research.md
- [ ] Constitution compliance validated
- [ ] Data model complete

### Implementation Phase
- [ ] All tests pass
- [ ] Linting clean
- [ ] Code review approved

Common Constitution Topics

Architecture Patterns

• Microservices vs monolith
• Layered architecture requirements
• Dependency injection patterns
• Event-driven vs request/response

Security Standards

• Authentication mechanisms
• Authorization patterns
• Data encryption requirements
• Secret management

Quality Standards

• Test coverage requirements
• Code review policies
• Documentation standards
• Performance budgets

Technology Stack

• Required languages/frameworks
• Approved libraries
• Forbidden technologies
• Version constraints

Development Process

• Branching strategy
• Commit message format
• PR requirements
• Release process

Interactive Constitution Creation

If user doesn't provide full constitution, ask:

1. Architecture: "What architectural patterns are required?" (microservices, monolith, serverless, etc.)
2. Security: "What security requirements are non-negotiable?" (encryption, auth, compliance, etc.)
3. Quality: "What quality gates must pass?" (tests, coverage, reviews, etc.)
4. Technology: "Are there required or forbidden technologies?" (languages, frameworks, databases, etc.)
5. Process: "What development processes are mandatory?" (reviews, docs, versioning, etc.)

Provide options with recommendations for each.

Success Indicators

Constitution is ready when:

• ✅ Principles clearly marked as MUST or SHOULD
• ✅ Rationale provided for critical constraints
• ✅ Quality gates explicitly defined
• ✅ Technology constraints documented
• ✅ All dependent templates synced
• ✅ No contradictory principles
• ✅ Enforcement mechanism clear

Output

.specify/memory/
└── constitution.md            # Project constitution

Updated templates:
- .specify/templates/spec-template.md
- .specify/templates/plan-template.md
- .specify/templates/tasks-template.md
- .specify/templates/checklist-template.md

Constitution Enforcement

During Specification

• Spec template includes constitution-mandated sections
• Quality checklist validates constitution compliance
• No forbidden technologies mentioned

During Planning

• Plan template includes Constitution Check section
• All MUST principles validated
• Violations require written justification
• Research.md references constitution decisions

During Implementation

• Task template includes constitution validation steps
• Pre-commit hooks enforce code standards
• CI/CD validates quality gates
• Reviews check compliance

Common Mistakes

❌ Too Many MUST Principles

Wrong: 50 MUST requirements (impossible to enforce) Right: 5-10 critical MUST requirements, rest are SHOULD

❌ Vague Principles

Wrong: "Code should be clean and maintainable" Right: "All functions <50 lines, test coverage ≥80%, ESLint clean"

❌ No Rationale

Wrong: "MUST use PostgreSQL" (why?) Right: "MUST use PostgreSQL (team expertise, ACID guarantees required, proven scale)"

❌ Contradictory Principles

Wrong: "MUST use microservices" + "MUST deploy as single binary" Right: Resolve contradiction before finalizing

❌ Unenforced Principles

Wrong: Constitution exists but never checked Right: All tools validate constitution compliance automatically

Example Constitution

# Project Constitution

## Architecture Principles

- [MUST] Use multi-agent system with OpenAI Agents SDK
- [MUST] Follow Composition Root dependency injection pattern
- [SHOULD] Prefer deterministic flows (low temperature) for sales agents

## Security Principles

- [MUST] Never expose internal identifiers to external systems
- [MUST] All secrets in environment variables, never committed
- [MUST] Authentication required for all customer-facing interactions

## Quality Principles

- [MUST] All code passes `npm test` before commit
- [MUST] All code passes `npm run lint` before commit
- [SHOULD] Test coverage ≥80% for critical paths

## Technology Constraints

- [MUST] TypeScript (no JavaScript)
- [MUST] MongoDB for persistence
- [MUST] OpenAI Agents SDK (no custom routing verbs)
- [FORBIDDEN] Custom SDK abstractions (YAGNI)

## Documentation Standards

- [MUST] All agents documented in README
- [SHOULD] Complex tools include usage examples
- [SHOULD] Architecture decisions in docs/architecture/

Related Skills

• speckit - Main workflow (uses constitution throughout)
• speckit-specify - Specification creation (validates against constitution)
• speckit-plan - Technical planning (validates against constitution)