security-review

name	security-review
display_name	Security Review
description	Reviews application code for security vulnerabilities, unsafe data handling, secret exposure, and risky defaults before merge or release.
category	code-quality
version	1.0.0
tags	["security","review","vulnerabilities","secrets","compliance"]
providers	["claude-code","codex","copilot","openclaw","hermes-agent"]
author	agent-skills contributors

Security Review

Use this skill when reviewing code, diffs, pull requests, configuration, or deployment changes for security risk.

Inputs

• Target diff, files, pull request, or codebase area
• Runtime context such as framework, language, cloud provider, auth model, or data sensitivity
• Any known threat model, compliance requirement, or recent incident context

Steps

1. Identify trust boundaries: user input, network calls, database access, file access, credentials, external services, and privileged operations.
2. Review authentication and authorization paths for missing checks, confused deputy risks, privilege escalation, insecure session handling, and tenant isolation bugs.
3. Inspect input handling for injection, path traversal, deserialization, unsafe redirects, SSRF, XSS, command execution, and parser edge cases.
4. Check secret handling: hardcoded keys, logs that expose tokens, unsafe environment variable use, weak rotation assumptions, and accidental credential persistence.
5. Review data protection: encryption, PII handling, access logging, retention, masking, backup exposure, and cross-environment data leakage.
6. Inspect dependency and configuration risk: insecure defaults, broad CORS, debug flags, weak TLS, overbroad IAM, unpinned tools, and supply-chain exposure.
7. Validate error handling and observability: avoid leaking sensitive details while preserving useful audit trails.
8. Prioritize findings by exploitability and impact.

Output

Return:

• Security posture summary
• Findings ordered by severity: Critical, High, Medium, Low
• File and line references where possible
• Exploit scenario in one or two sentences for each significant finding
• Concrete remediation steps
• Residual risk or assumptions

Guidelines

• Do not invent vulnerabilities. If a risk depends on an assumption, say so.
• Prefer specific fixes over generic advice.
• Treat missing tests for security-sensitive behavior as a finding.
• Call out strong security decisions when they reduce risk.