القائمة
Assess the Agent Readiness level of the current project across all 11 criteria (C1.1–C8.2) and produce a structured report with the achieved level, per-criterion scores, gaps, and recommendations.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Assess the Agent Readiness level of the current project across all 11 criteria (C1.1–C8.2) and produce a structured report with the achieved level, per-criterion scores, gaps, and recommendations.
Verify readiness criterion C1.1 (Codebase Accessibility) in the current project. Reports fulfillment level 0–2.
Verify readiness criterion C2.1 (Setup Automation) in the current project. Reports fulfillment level 0–3.
Verify readiness criterion C3.1 (Architecture Depth) in the current project. Reports fulfillment level 0–3.
Verify readiness criterion C5.1 (Runnability) in the current project. Reports fulfillment level 0–2.
Verify readiness criterion C5.2 (Unit Test Coverage) in the current project. Reports fulfillment level 0–3.
| name | assess-readiness |
| description | Assess the Agent Readiness level of the current project across all 11 criteria (C1.1–C8.2) and produce a structured report with the achieved level, per-criterion scores, gaps, and recommendations. |
| allowed-tools | Bash Read |
This skill runs all 11 criterion checks and produces a structured readiness report.
For each criterion, read the corresponding skill file and follow its evidence-gathering and scoring instructions. Record the score before moving to the next criterion.
/verify-c1-1 skill/verify-c2-1 skill/verify-c3-1 skill/verify-c4-1 skill/verify-c5-1 skill/verify-c5-2 skill/verify-c5-3 skill/verify-c6-1 skill/verify-c7-1 skill/verify-c8-1 skill/verify-c8-2 skillAfter scoring all criteria, determine the highest readiness level where all thresholds are met:
| Criterion | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1.1 | ≥ 1 | ≥ 2 | ≥ 2 |
| C2.1 | ≥ 1 | ≥ 2 | ≥ 3 |
| C3.1 | — | ≥ 1 | ≥ 3 |
| C4.1 | — | ≥ 1 | ≥ 3 |
| C5.1 | ≥ 1 | ≥ 2 | ≥ 2 |
| C5.2 | ≥ 1 | ≥ 2 | ≥ 3 |
| C5.3 | — | ≥ 1 | ≥ 2 |
| C6.1 | — | ≥ 1 | ≥ 2 |
| C7.1 | — | — | ≥ 2 (skip if N/A) |
| C8.1 | — | ≥ 1 | ≥ 3 |
| C8.2 | — | — | ≥ 2 |
Check Level 1 first. If all Level 1 thresholds are met, check Level 2. If all Level 2 thresholds are met, check Level 3. The achieved level is the highest where all thresholds pass.
Produce a report in exactly this structure:
Project: [name from README or directory name] Date: [today's date]
Level names: 0 = Uninstrumented, 1 = Foundation, 2 = Guided Autonomy, 3 = Supervised Autonomy
| Criterion | Name | Score | Max |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1.1 | Codebase Accessibility | [score] | 2 |
| C2.1 | Setup Automation | [score] | 3 |
| C3.1 | Architecture Depth | [score] | 3 |
| C4.1 | Requirements Access | [score] | 3 |
| C5.1 | Runnability | [score] | 2 |
| C5.2 | Unit Test Coverage | [score] | 3 |
| C5.3 | Integration and E2E Coverage | [score] | 3 |
| C6.1 | Static Analysis | [score] | 3 |
| C7.1 | Test Isolation | [score or N/A] | 2 |
| C8.1 | CI/CD Automation | [score] | 3 |
| C8.2 | Observability | [score] | 3 |
[If the project is at Level 3, write "Maximum level reached."]
[Otherwise, list each criterion that is below the threshold for Level N+1:]
To reach Level [N+1] ([Name]), improve:
[3–5 prioritised, actionable recommendations based on the gaps. Order by impact: criteria that block a level increase first, then criteria where incremental improvement is easiest.]