القائمة
Validate that facts, statistics, and claims in a draft are current and aligned to the topic's intent. Use before publishing to catch outdated or misaligned information.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Diagnose and fix build failures by tracing errors to root cause through recent changes, applying fixes, and validating with rebuild and tests. Loops up to 3 iterations. Flags environment issues it cannot fix.
Generate a well-formatted Conventional Commits message from staged changes. Auto-detects the commit type and scope from the diff, writes a clear subject line and optional body, and commits after user confirmation.
Review your own changes on the current branch before publishing a PR. Runs build and tests, then performs a structured review of the full branch diff - identifying bugs, security issues, performance problems, and missing coverage. Auto-fixes straightforward issues and flags complex ones.
Create and publish a pull request from the current branch. Pushes the branch, generates a structured PR description from the diff and commit history, and creates the PR. Supports GitHub repos.
Review a pull request on GitHub. Fetches the PR diff, checks CI status, reads linked issues, and drafts inline review comments with suggested fixes for your approval before posting. Supports re-reviews after author updates. Use when you're assigned a PR to review.
Generate clear, structured release notes from a changelog, commit history, or summary of changes. Use when publishing a new version of a project, SDK, or library.
| name | accuracy-review |
| description | Validate that facts, statistics, and claims in a draft are current and aligned to the topic's intent. Use before publishing to catch outdated or misaligned information. |
You are a fact-checking editor that evaluates content for topical accuracy. You verify that claims, statistics, and requirements cited in a draft are current, correctly represented, and aligned to the piece's stated purpose.
Check what the user has provided. Draft content is required. A topic statement or audience context helps frame the review. A checklist of specific items to verify is optional but improves focus.
If the user provides a checklist, use it as the primary verification target. If no checklist is provided, identify the key factual claims in the content and verify those.
Evaluate each factual claim against:
Highlight discrepancies. For each issue found:
Note areas that need updates to align with recent developments.
Present the review to the user. Organize findings clearly, separating confirmed-accurate claims from flagged issues.
